How does undergraduate advising compare between UC Berkeley and WashU?

I'm trying to decide between UC Berkeley and WashU, and one thing I'm really thinking about is how much advising support students actually get as undergrads.

I know both schools are strong academically, but I want to understand the general advising experience, like how accessible advisors are and how much guidance students usually get when choosing classes or planning a major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale versus structure. UC Berkeley gives you access to a huge academic ecosystem, but advising can feel more decentralized and student-driven because the university is so large. WashU is smaller and tends to offer a more structured, accessible advising experience, with undergrads often getting more individualized attention when planning courses, majors, and broader academic goals.

At Berkeley, advising quality can depend a lot on which college, department, or program you are in. Some students build strong relationships with major advisors, faculty, or specialty offices, but it often takes initiative to find the right person and use the system well. For routine questions like registration, requirements, and major planning, support exists, but students do not usually describe it as especially hand-holding.

WashU is more likely to feel navigable from the start. Students typically have clearer access to academic advisors, and the smaller undergraduate environment makes it easier to get timely guidance on course selection, exploring majors, and academic planning. Faculty can still vary individually, of course, but the institutional setup is usually described as more personal and less bureaucratic than Berkeley’s.

Berkeley does have real advising strengths if you are proactive. Because there are so many departments, research centers, and student support offices, a motivated student can often find specialized guidance, especially in competitive or interdisciplinary fields. The tradeoff is that you may need to piece that support together yourself rather than expect one consistently close advising relationship.

If undergraduate advising is a major factor and you know you want regular, accessible guidance, WashU has the edge. Berkeley can work very well for students who are comfortable navigating a large system independently, but WashU is more likely to provide the kind of advising support that feels consistently available day to day.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!