WashU vs Penn for economics: which is the better choice for an undergraduate econ major?
I’m trying to decide between WashU and Penn and I’m interested in studying economics in college. Both schools seem strong overall, but I’m mainly trying to figure out which one gives undergrads a better economics experience.
I’m looking at things like the strength of the econ program, access to professors, and whether the major feels more practical or more academic.
I’m looking at things like the strength of the econ program, access to professors, and whether the major feels more practical or more academic.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
Penn has the edge for undergraduate economics. Its economics ecosystem is unusually broad because the major sits alongside Wharton, the Penn Development Research Initiative, the Penn Institute for Urban Research, and a very large finance and policy recruiting pipeline, so undergrads who want economics tied to business, data, public policy, or research usually find more built-in options there. WashU is excellent, but Penn offers a denser concentration of econ-related courses, centers, and professional pathways.
One concrete difference is how practical the curriculum can feel. At Penn, an econ student can stay in the College of Arts and Sciences and still take advantage of nearby Wharton coursework, quantitatively oriented electives, and a campus culture where economics connects directly to consulting, banking, public policy, and analytics. That makes it easier to shape the major toward applied work without feeling boxed into a purely theoretical track.
Another difference is the scale and visibility of the faculty and research environment. Penn’s department has a stronger national profile in economics, and for undergrads that often translates into more seminar activity, more RA possibilities, and more exposure to faculty working in fields like micro theory, macro, econometrics, health, and development. WashU students may sometimes find professor access a bit more personal because the overall campus can feel less intense, but Penn still gives undergrads substantial access if they are proactive.
The last major separator is recruiting and network effects. For economics, Penn benefits from Philadelphia, the Wharton adjacency, and a very large alumni network in finance, consulting, tech, and policy. Even if you do not want a preprofessional experience, that infrastructure affects internships, student organizations, and employer attention in ways that are hard to match.
WashU becomes more compelling if you strongly value a more contained campus culture and potentially easier day-to-day faculty interaction, but for the best overall undergraduate economics platform, Penn comes out ahead.
One concrete difference is how practical the curriculum can feel. At Penn, an econ student can stay in the College of Arts and Sciences and still take advantage of nearby Wharton coursework, quantitatively oriented electives, and a campus culture where economics connects directly to consulting, banking, public policy, and analytics. That makes it easier to shape the major toward applied work without feeling boxed into a purely theoretical track.
Another difference is the scale and visibility of the faculty and research environment. Penn’s department has a stronger national profile in economics, and for undergrads that often translates into more seminar activity, more RA possibilities, and more exposure to faculty working in fields like micro theory, macro, econometrics, health, and development. WashU students may sometimes find professor access a bit more personal because the overall campus can feel less intense, but Penn still gives undergrads substantial access if they are proactive.
The last major separator is recruiting and network effects. For economics, Penn benefits from Philadelphia, the Wharton adjacency, and a very large alumni network in finance, consulting, tech, and policy. Even if you do not want a preprofessional experience, that infrastructure affects internships, student organizations, and employer attention in ways that are hard to match.
WashU becomes more compelling if you strongly value a more contained campus culture and potentially easier day-to-day faculty interaction, but for the best overall undergraduate economics platform, Penn comes out ahead.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
WashU vs Bucknell for business: which is the better choice for undergraduate business?
UC San Diego vs UChicago for economics: which is better for an undergrad econ major?
WashU vs UT Austin for computer science: which is the better choice for a CS major?
UC Irvine vs Boston College for psychology: which is the better choice for an undergraduate student?
Washington University in St. Louis vs Cornell for economics: which is better for undergrad econ?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!