UT Austin vs WashU for business: which is better for internships and recruiting?
I’m trying to decide between UT Austin and WashU for undergrad business and keep going back and forth. Both seem strong, but I’m mainly thinking about which one would give me better internship access and recruiting opportunities after college.
I’m a high school senior and want a school where business students have solid career outcomes, not just a good reputation.
I’m a high school senior and want a school where business students have solid career outcomes, not just a good reputation.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For internships and recruiting in business, UT Austin usually has the stronger built-in pipeline, especially if you are interested in finance, consulting, tech, or staying in Texas after graduation. McCombs has deep employer ties in Austin, Dallas, and Houston, and the sheer size of UT means more companies recruit there at scale. WashU can still place very well, but its recruiting tends to reward students who are more proactive and who want a smaller, more personalized environment.
UT Austin fits the student who wants a campus where business recruiting feels highly structured and constantly in motion. Being in Austin matters: during the school year, students are near a major business and tech hub, which can make in-semester internships and networking easier than at many college-town campuses. McCombs also has a very visible brand with employers across Texas, and that alumni network is especially useful for banking, consulting, real estate, and corporate roles in the region.
WashU makes more sense for a student who prefers smaller classes, easier access to professors and advisors, and a campus where it may be simpler to stand out individually. Olin students often benefit from closer mentorship and personalized career support, and WashU has a strong national reputation that can travel well outside one region. For someone aiming at certain East Coast or Midwest opportunities, or who wants a less crowded recruiting environment, that can be a real advantage.
The tradeoff is volume versus intimacy. UT tends to offer more total recruiters, more on-campus activity, and a broader set of internship paths just because of its scale and location. WashU may give you more hand-holding and less competition within the business school, but it does not have the same obvious regional recruiting machine that McCombs has.
If your priority is maximizing internship access and employer traffic, I would lean UT Austin. If your priority is individualized support and a smaller academic setting where you can build close relationships while still having strong outcomes, WashU has a compelling case.
UT Austin fits the student who wants a campus where business recruiting feels highly structured and constantly in motion. Being in Austin matters: during the school year, students are near a major business and tech hub, which can make in-semester internships and networking easier than at many college-town campuses. McCombs also has a very visible brand with employers across Texas, and that alumni network is especially useful for banking, consulting, real estate, and corporate roles in the region.
WashU makes more sense for a student who prefers smaller classes, easier access to professors and advisors, and a campus where it may be simpler to stand out individually. Olin students often benefit from closer mentorship and personalized career support, and WashU has a strong national reputation that can travel well outside one region. For someone aiming at certain East Coast or Midwest opportunities, or who wants a less crowded recruiting environment, that can be a real advantage.
The tradeoff is volume versus intimacy. UT tends to offer more total recruiters, more on-campus activity, and a broader set of internship paths just because of its scale and location. WashU may give you more hand-holding and less competition within the business school, but it does not have the same obvious regional recruiting machine that McCombs has.
If your priority is maximizing internship access and employer traffic, I would lean UT Austin. If your priority is individualized support and a smaller academic setting where you can build close relationships while still having strong outcomes, WashU has a compelling case.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
UT Austin vs Notre Dame for business: which is the better choice for undergrad business?
Which is better for internships: UT Austin or USC?
UT Austin vs Michigan for recruiting: which is better for landing internships and jobs in business and tech?
UT Austin vs Rice for internships: which school offers better access to internship opportunities?
For tech internships, is UT Austin or UC Berkeley the better college choice?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!