Is WashU or Brown better for biology undergraduates?

I’m trying to decide between WashU and Brown and I want to study biology, possibly on a pre-med or research path. I know both schools are strong overall, but I’m trying to understand which one is generally better for an undergraduate biology major in terms of classes, research, and preparation for the next step.

I’m not looking for a ranking based on prestige alone, just which school tends to be the better choice for biology as an undergrad.
3 hours ago
 • 
0 views
Sundial Team
3 hours ago
For undergraduate biology, WashU often has the edge for students who want a more structured science experience, especially if they are seriously considering pre-med or want very early access to a major medical center. Its biology ecosystem is tightly connected to the WashU School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, and strong life sciences research, which can make research, clinical exposure, and advising feel especially built-out. If you want a campus where many students are on science and health pathways and the support structure around that is very visible, WashU is a compelling choice.

WashU tends to suit students who like clear requirements, strong departmental organization, and a science culture where it is normal to pursue lab work, shadowing, and medically adjacent activities alongside classes. For biology specifically, that can translate into a lot of options across molecular biology, neuroscience, biochemistry, ecology, and related areas, with a practical pipeline into research groups. For a student who already expects biology to be central to college, that concentration can be a real advantage.

Brown is especially appealing for a different kind of biology student: someone who wants more academic freedom, more room to combine biology with another field, and a less prescriptive undergraduate experience. The Open Curriculum makes it easier to explore biology alongside public health, computer science, anthropology, neuroscience, or policy without feeling boxed in by distribution requirements. Brown also has strong research and good pre-med outcomes, but the experience is usually less structured and asks you to be more self-directed.

That makes Brown particularly attractive for students who are excited by biology but do not want their college life to revolve around a pre-professional science track. If you imagine yourself shaping an unusual academic path, taking courses across divisions, or approaching biology through broader intellectual questions, Brown can be a better environment. Its undergraduate focus and flexible culture are a real draw for students who want science without a rigid framework.

So in direct terms: for a classic biology-plus-pre-med or lab-research route, WashU more often stands out. For a student who wants biology in a highly flexible liberal arts environment and may want to build a more individualized path, Brown can be the more satisfying choice.

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!