WashU vs. Emory: How do their biology programs compare for undergraduate research opportunities?

I’m a high school senior deciding between Washington University in St. Louis and Emory for a biology major. I’m especially interested in getting involved in research as an undergraduate, but I’m not sure how accessible lab opportunities are for students at each school.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical difference is that WashU places undergraduates near a particularly large, research-intensive medical-school environment in St. Louis, while Emory offers unusually direct connections to public health, clinical research, and Atlanta-based institutions such as the CDC. At both schools, biology students can join labs early, but neither treats research as automatic: students typically need to identify faculty whose work interests them, send targeted outreach, and follow up. WashU’s separate Danforth undergraduate campus and Medical Campus can require more intentional navigation, whereas Emory’s biology, health-sciences, and medical research communities are closely interwoven around its Atlanta campus.

WashU is especially attractive for students drawn to molecular biology, genetics, neuroscience, biomedical engineering, cancer biology, and basic or translational biomedical research. The university’s medical school and affiliated research centers create a deep pool of laboratories, and undergraduates can pursue structured summer research, faculty-mentored work during the year, and research for credit. The scale also means many possible mentors, though popular labs may be competitive and transportation or scheduling between campuses can matter.

Emory has strong opportunities in cell and molecular biology, neuroscience, immunology, infectious disease, ecology and evolution, and human health. Its location and institutional relationships can be a meaningful advantage for students interested in epidemiology, global health, health disparities, infectious diseases, or clinical research. Emory undergraduates also use formal research programs and can approach biology faculty, medical-school investigators, and affiliated research groups.

For a student primarily seeking intensive bench science and access to a broad medical-research ecosystem, WashU has a slight edge in depth. For someone who wants biology research tied closely to public health, clinical questions, or infectious disease in Atlanta, Emory may provide the more distinctive set of opportunities. In either case, the better choice is the one where you can identify several specific labs and professors whose current work genuinely matches your interests.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!