Is MIT or Harvard better for studying economics as an undergraduate?

I’m a high school senior deciding between MIT and Harvard, and I’m interested in majoring in economics. I want to understand how the two schools compare specifically for undergraduate economics, including the academic environment and opportunities for research or graduate study.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is that MIT economics places you in a more mathematically intensive, technology-oriented undergraduate culture, while Harvard offers a broader liberal-arts setting with more room to combine economics with fields such as government, history, philosophy, or social studies. Both departments are world-class, and students at either school can take courses across the MIT-Harvard cross-registration system. The distinction is less about whether one can prepare you for elite research or graduate study, and more about the style of education and peer environment you want every day.

MIT’s economics major, Course 14, is particularly attractive for students who enjoy calculus, statistics, modeling, computation, and the connection between economics and fields such as computer science, data science, engineering, and finance. Undergraduate research is deeply embedded in MIT’s culture through UROP, which can make it especially straightforward to seek research roles with faculty. MIT also has a smaller undergraduate population and a concentrated STEM atmosphere, so an economics student is likely to be surrounded by peers who are comfortable with highly technical work.

Harvard economics is also rigorous and quantitative, especially in its upper-level theory, econometrics, and honors-track coursework, but its academic culture is more varied. Harvard may offer a more natural home for someone interested in political economy, public policy, economic history, development, law, or the philosophical and institutional questions behind markets. Research opportunities are substantial, including faculty assistantships and thesis work, and Harvard’s larger range of undergraduate programs can make interdisciplinary exploration easier.

For graduate-school preparation, either choice can be exceptional. Strong grades in advanced mathematics, econometrics, and economics theory; close faculty relationships; meaningful research; and a serious thesis or research project will matter more than the school name. MIT may make the most sense for a student already eager for a heavily technical economics path, while Harvard is the better destination for someone who wants equally high-level economics alongside wider humanities and social-science exploration.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!