How selective are Carnegie Mellon and UMass Amherst compared with each other?

Carnegie Mellon is substantially more selective overall than UMass Amherst, and its most sought-after programs, especially computer science, engineering, design, and drama, are among the most competitive undergraduate options in the country.

UMass Amherst is also a selective public research university, but it admits a broader range of academically strong students and has a less uniformly restrictive admissions environment. Its competitiveness varies meaningfully by major: computer science, business, engineering, nursing, and some other capacity-limited programs draw especially strong pools, while other colleges may be more accessible.

A student aiming at Carnegie Mellon should expect to need an exceptionally rigorous academic record, strong preparation in the intended field, and evidence of depth beyond grades. For technical programs, advanced math and science coursework, substantial projects, research, competitions, or other authentic engagement can matter because many applicants already have excellent transcripts.

UMass Amherst can be a realistic target or reach depending on the student’s major and academic profile. It still values challenging coursework and strong grades, but a well-qualified applicant does not need the same level of specialized distinction that is often necessary to stand out at Carnegie Mellon.