Is Carnegie Mellon or Brown more selective for undergraduate admissions?
I’m trying to compare the overall selectivity of Carnegie Mellon and Brown as part of my college list. I know both are very competitive, but I keep seeing different opinions online about which one is harder to get into.
I’m mainly looking for a general comparison of how selective they are for undergrad admissions.
I’m mainly looking for a general comparison of how selective they are for undergrad admissions.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
Brown is more selective overall for undergraduate admissions.
One important difference is consistency across majors. At Brown, admissions is very selective across the board, while Carnegie Mellon’s selectivity varies much more by school and program. CMU programs like computer science, engineering, design, and drama can be extraordinarily difficult to enter, and in some cases may be as hard as or harder than Brown for that specific major, but that is not true of every CMU division.
Carnegie Mellon is still extremely competitive, but it is more specialized in how that competitiveness shows up. Students applying to high-demand technical or arts programs at CMU often face a very tough admissions process, sometimes including portfolios or auditions depending on the school. So for an overall university-level comparison, Brown is the harder admit, while at the program level, some CMU majors can be every bit as selective.
One important difference is consistency across majors. At Brown, admissions is very selective across the board, while Carnegie Mellon’s selectivity varies much more by school and program. CMU programs like computer science, engineering, design, and drama can be extraordinarily difficult to enter, and in some cases may be as hard as or harder than Brown for that specific major, but that is not true of every CMU division.
Carnegie Mellon is still extremely competitive, but it is more specialized in how that competitiveness shows up. Students applying to high-demand technical or arts programs at CMU often face a very tough admissions process, sometimes including portfolios or auditions depending on the school. So for an overall university-level comparison, Brown is the harder admit, while at the program level, some CMU majors can be every bit as selective.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Is UVA or Cornell more selective for undergraduate admissions?
Is Georgetown or Boston University more selective for undergraduate admissions?
Is Carnegie Mellon or Brown better for tech recruiting?
How does admissions difficulty at Carnegie Mellon compare to Tufts for undergraduate applicants?
How do Carnegie Mellon and Boston University compare in college admissions selectivity for undergraduate applicants?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!