Is Ohio State or Brown better for undergraduate research opportunities?
I’m trying to choose between Ohio State and Brown, and undergraduate research is a big factor for me. I want a place where it’s realistic to get involved early and do meaningful research as an undergrad.
I’m not just asking which school is stronger overall, but which one tends to be better for undergraduates who want hands-on research experience.
I’m not just asking which school is stronger overall, but which one tends to be better for undergraduates who want hands-on research experience.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For an undergraduate who wants research to be central from the start, Brown usually gives the more undergraduate-focused experience. Brown’s smaller size, open curriculum, and strong emphasis on independent work often make it easier to build close faculty relationships early, and that matters a lot when you want meaningful lab or project responsibility rather than just a résumé line. Brown also has a long tradition of senior theses and faculty-mentored independent study, so undergrads are very much part of the research culture.
Brown tends to fit students who want a more self-directed path. If you like the idea of shaping your own academic plan, emailing professors with a specific intellectual interest, and moving fairly quickly into tighter mentorship, Brown is appealing. In practice, students there often find that professors are used to working directly with undergraduates, not just graduate students and postdocs.
Ohio State is excellent for the student who wants sheer scale and range. As a major public research university, it offers a huge number of labs, centers, hospitals, and funded projects across many fields, especially if your interests might shift or span multiple areas. If you want options in engineering, the sciences, medicine-related research, agriculture, public policy, or large interdisciplinary institutes, Ohio State can be incredibly rich.
The tradeoff is that at a place Ohio State’s size, access can depend more on how proactive you are and on the specific department. There are absolutely undergrads doing serious research there, including early on, but the experience can feel less uniformly personal because you are in a much larger ecosystem with more graduate students. For some students, that is a plus because there are so many entry points; for others, it means you have to push harder to stand out.
So if your question is specifically about realistic early access to hands-on, faculty-connected undergraduate research, Brown has the edge. If what you value most is the breadth of opportunities and the ability to plug into a very large research enterprise, Ohio State may offer more total possibilities.
Brown tends to fit students who want a more self-directed path. If you like the idea of shaping your own academic plan, emailing professors with a specific intellectual interest, and moving fairly quickly into tighter mentorship, Brown is appealing. In practice, students there often find that professors are used to working directly with undergraduates, not just graduate students and postdocs.
Ohio State is excellent for the student who wants sheer scale and range. As a major public research university, it offers a huge number of labs, centers, hospitals, and funded projects across many fields, especially if your interests might shift or span multiple areas. If you want options in engineering, the sciences, medicine-related research, agriculture, public policy, or large interdisciplinary institutes, Ohio State can be incredibly rich.
The tradeoff is that at a place Ohio State’s size, access can depend more on how proactive you are and on the specific department. There are absolutely undergrads doing serious research there, including early on, but the experience can feel less uniformly personal because you are in a much larger ecosystem with more graduate students. For some students, that is a plus because there are so many entry points; for others, it means you have to push harder to stand out.
So if your question is specifically about realistic early access to hands-on, faculty-connected undergraduate research, Brown has the edge. If what you value most is the breadth of opportunities and the ability to plug into a very large research enterprise, Ohio State may offer more total possibilities.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Is UC San Diego or UC Merced better for undergraduate research opportunities?
Clemson vs Emory for neuroscience major: which is better for undergraduate research and pre-med opportunities?
Ohio State vs Boston University for research opportunities in college
Ohio State vs UChicago for economics: which is better for an undergraduate economics major?
Ohio State vs Iowa for biology: which is better for an undergraduate pre-med student?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!