Arizona State vs University of Southern California for communications: which is better for an undergraduate degree?
I’m trying to decide between Arizona State and USC for communications and I’m mostly focused on the undergrad experience. I want to know which school is generally considered stronger for a communications major in terms of academics, networking, and opportunities after graduation.
I’m a high school junior and trying to narrow down my college list based on the program itself, not just the overall campus name.
I’m a high school junior and trying to narrow down my college list based on the program itself, not just the overall campus name.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale versus concentration: Arizona State offers a very large university ecosystem with lots of student media and flexibility, while USC gives you a more tightly connected communications environment with stronger built-in industry proximity in Los Angeles. For communications specifically, USC’s Annenberg School carries more national prestige, deeper media and entertainment connections, and a particularly strong alumni network tied to journalism, public relations, digital media, and communication fields. ASU is still a credible option, especially through the Walter Cronkite School for journalism and mass communication, but for communications as a whole, USC is usually viewed as the more powerful undergraduate platform.
Academically, USC has the clearer edge for a student whose priority is the communications program itself. Annenberg is one of the best-known schools in the country for communication and media-related study, and that reputation matters when internships and first jobs are competitive. It also tends to offer strong access to faculty, professional programming, and interdisciplinary overlap with film, business, public policy, and marketing.
ASU does well on opportunity and breadth. Because it is such a large institution, there are many campus organizations, student media outlets, and chances to get involved early. That can be a real advantage for undergrads who are proactive. But the size of ASU also means opportunities may feel more self-directed, whereas USC often has a more curated pipeline into internships, alumni connections, and major-city employers.
On networking and post-grad outcomes, USC stands out more clearly. Being in Los Angeles matters for communications students, especially if you are interested in entertainment, media, public relations, content strategy, advertising-adjacent work, or digital storytelling. USC’s alumni network is famously active, and in communications fields that network can open doors faster than at most schools.
If cost is anywhere close, USC is the stronger choice for undergraduate communications. If ASU would be dramatically more affordable, then it becomes a more serious contender, because communications is a field where internships, portfolio-building, and experience can matter as much as the school name.
Academically, USC has the clearer edge for a student whose priority is the communications program itself. Annenberg is one of the best-known schools in the country for communication and media-related study, and that reputation matters when internships and first jobs are competitive. It also tends to offer strong access to faculty, professional programming, and interdisciplinary overlap with film, business, public policy, and marketing.
ASU does well on opportunity and breadth. Because it is such a large institution, there are many campus organizations, student media outlets, and chances to get involved early. That can be a real advantage for undergrads who are proactive. But the size of ASU also means opportunities may feel more self-directed, whereas USC often has a more curated pipeline into internships, alumni connections, and major-city employers.
On networking and post-grad outcomes, USC stands out more clearly. Being in Los Angeles matters for communications students, especially if you are interested in entertainment, media, public relations, content strategy, advertising-adjacent work, or digital storytelling. USC’s alumni network is famously active, and in communications fields that network can open doors faster than at most schools.
If cost is anywhere close, USC is the stronger choice for undergraduate communications. If ASU would be dramatically more affordable, then it becomes a more serious contender, because communications is a field where internships, portfolio-building, and experience can matter as much as the school name.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Arizona State vs Villanova for business: which is better for an undergraduate business degree?
Arizona State vs University of Southern California for internship opportunities
Arizona State vs Wesleyan for film studies: which is better for an undergraduate film major?
Which is better for undergraduate research: Arizona State University or Caltech?
Arizona State vs. Florida State for business: which school has the better undergraduate business program?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!