Baylor vs Loyola Marymount for business: which is better for career outcomes and internships?

The biggest practical tradeoff is location versus built-in business school reach. Loyola Marymount gives you direct access to the Los Angeles market during the school year, which can make internships easier to stack while you are enrolled, while Baylor has a more established undergraduate business reputation and a very structured career pipeline through the Hankamer School of Business. For career outcomes, both can work well, but they tend to create opportunities in different ways.

LMU’s advantage is being in Los Angeles. That matters for internships in entertainment business, marketing, media, real estate, startups, and finance-adjacent roles where proximity and networking often drive hiring. Employers can bring students in part time during the semester, and that can be a real edge if you want repeated experience before senior year.

Baylor’s advantage is the business school itself and the alumni network, especially across Texas. Hankamer is well known within the region, and Baylor tends to do a strong job with employer-facing programming, business student organizations, career fairs, and professional development.

For pure internship volume during college, LMU may have the easier path because of LA. For post-grad placement structure, Baylor often feels more organized and predictable, especially if you are open to Texas. Baylor’s alumni base is also notably loyal, which can matter a lot for first-job networking.

If career outcomes and recruiting support are the main criteria, I would lean Baylor unless you specifically want to build your career in Los Angeles and plan to use the city aggressively for internships. LMU is compelling because of where it sits; Baylor is compelling because the business pipeline itself is usually the stronger asset.