Is Purdue or UCLA harder to get into overall?
I'm trying to compare colleges for my list, and these two come up a lot. I know both are competitive, but I'm having trouble understanding which one is generally harder to get into overall.
I’m mainly looking for a simple comparison based on selectivity, not a breakdown by major.
I’m mainly looking for a simple comparison based on selectivity, not a breakdown by major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
UCLA is harder to get into overall. It draws an enormous applicant pool every year, is one of the most sought-after public universities in the country, and admissions there are notably tighter across the university than at Purdue.
One big reason is sheer demand. UCLA receives far more applications and has a much more compressed admit pool, which makes admission feel more competitive even before you get into any specific program. Purdue is certainly selective and well known, especially for engineering and STEM, but university-wide it is not usually operating at the same level of overall admissions pressure as UCLA.
Another difference is how each school is perceived in broad admissions terms. UCLA is commonly treated as a highly selective reach for many strong applicants, including students with excellent grades and activities. Purdue can absolutely be a reach too, but overall it tends to be more accessible than UCLA when you look at the university as a whole rather than the most competitive majors.
The in-state and out-of-state dynamic also matters less to this comparison than people sometimes assume. UCLA is very competitive for both groups, and even California residents are applying into an extremely selective process. Purdue does have strong demand from nonresident students too, but that still does not usually push its overall selectivity past UCLA’s.
One big reason is sheer demand. UCLA receives far more applications and has a much more compressed admit pool, which makes admission feel more competitive even before you get into any specific program. Purdue is certainly selective and well known, especially for engineering and STEM, but university-wide it is not usually operating at the same level of overall admissions pressure as UCLA.
Another difference is how each school is perceived in broad admissions terms. UCLA is commonly treated as a highly selective reach for many strong applicants, including students with excellent grades and activities. Purdue can absolutely be a reach too, but overall it tends to be more accessible than UCLA when you look at the university as a whole rather than the most competitive majors.
The in-state and out-of-state dynamic also matters less to this comparison than people sometimes assume. UCLA is very competitive for both groups, and even California residents are applying into an extremely selective process. Purdue does have strong demand from nonresident students too, but that still does not usually push its overall selectivity past UCLA’s.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!