Drexel vs University of Washington: which is better value for money for an undergraduate degree?

I'm trying to compare Drexel and the University of Washington based on overall value, not just reputation. I know the total cost can be pretty different once you factor in tuition, living expenses, and how long it takes to finish the degree.

I want to understand which school tends to give students a better return for the money spent, especially for someone majoring in a field where internships and job outcomes matter a lot.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For overall value, University of Washington tends to come out ahead for many students, especially Washington residents. Drexel can still make financial sense for a student who will fully use its co-op system and wants a career-focused experience built into the academic calendar.

UW is often the more cost-effective choice because you are paying less for a degree from a highly respected public university with strong outcomes in in-demand fields. Seattle living costs are not cheap, but Drexel’s private-school price tag is typically much higher, and Drexel’s co-op structure can stretch the undergraduate timeline depending on the program. If you are in-state for UW, the value difference becomes even more noticeable.

Drexel fits the student who wants work experience to be central, not optional. Its co-op program is one of the school’s biggest advantages, and for students in engineering, computing, business, design, or other applied majors, that can mean graduating with substantial resume experience and clearer job direction. For someone who learns best by alternating classroom study with full-time work, that model can justify the higher cost, especially if co-op earnings offset part of it.

UW fits the student who wants a stronger combination of lower cost and broad academic strength. It offers major research opportunities, access to a deep Seattle-area job market, and a more traditional four-year path for many students. In fields where internships matter, UW students still have strong access to them, but you usually need to be more proactive than at Drexel, where structured work experience is baked into the program.

One caution with UW is capacity-constrained majors. If your intended major is competitive to enter after enrollment, that can affect value if you are not admitted to the program you want. One caution with Drexel is straightforward cost: even with merit aid, many families find the net price high.

If the net price is anywhere close, I would lean toward UW for value. Drexel becomes compelling when its scholarship package is strong and you specifically want the co-op-heavy structure enough to make that extra cost feel purposeful.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!