University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign vs. University of Rochester for economics: which is better for undergrad?
I’m trying to narrow down my college list and both of these schools are on it for economics. I’m mainly looking at the strength of the undergrad economics program and how well the school prepares students for internships, research, and grad school.
Since I can only pick one, I want to know which school is generally the stronger choice for an economics major.
Since I can only pick one, I want to know which school is generally the stronger choice for an economics major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale versus intimacy. UIUC gives you a larger economics department inside a very broad, well-resourced public research university with strong recruiting ties and lots of adjacent strengths in math, statistics, CS, and business-related fields. Rochester offers a smaller, more personalized academic environment where it can be easier to build close relationships with professors early, which matters for research access and grad school recommendations.
For undergraduate economics specifically, UIUC usually has the edge in overall depth and breadth. You get a bigger course selection, a larger academic ecosystem, and more ways to pair economics with quantitative work, especially if you are interested in econometrics, data analysis, finance-adjacent paths, or policy research.
Rochester is still a serious option for economics, particularly for students who want a more discussion-oriented setting and easier faculty access. Its economics department has a strong analytical reputation, and the school’s flexible curriculum can help if you want to combine econ with math, political science, or data-heavy work without as many distribution constraints. For a student targeting a PhD, that close mentoring can be a real advantage if you take the most rigorous coursework and pursue research early.
On internships, UIUC likely offers the stronger platform simply because of size, employer visibility, and the surrounding pre-professional infrastructure. On research and grad school preparation, Rochester can compete well because smaller departments sometimes make it easier for undergrads to stand out, but UIUC’s scale gives you more total opportunities if you are proactive.
If the question is which one is the stronger all-around pick for undergraduate economics, I would lean UIUC. Rochester becomes more compelling if you know you learn best in smaller classes, want closer faculty interaction from the start, and care as much about academic environment as about the department’s overall reach.
For undergraduate economics specifically, UIUC usually has the edge in overall depth and breadth. You get a bigger course selection, a larger academic ecosystem, and more ways to pair economics with quantitative work, especially if you are interested in econometrics, data analysis, finance-adjacent paths, or policy research.
Rochester is still a serious option for economics, particularly for students who want a more discussion-oriented setting and easier faculty access. Its economics department has a strong analytical reputation, and the school’s flexible curriculum can help if you want to combine econ with math, political science, or data-heavy work without as many distribution constraints. For a student targeting a PhD, that close mentoring can be a real advantage if you take the most rigorous coursework and pursue research early.
On internships, UIUC likely offers the stronger platform simply because of size, employer visibility, and the surrounding pre-professional infrastructure. On research and grad school preparation, Rochester can compete well because smaller departments sometimes make it easier for undergrads to stand out, but UIUC’s scale gives you more total opportunities if you are proactive.
If the question is which one is the stronger all-around pick for undergraduate economics, I would lean UIUC. Rochester becomes more compelling if you know you learn best in smaller classes, want closer faculty interaction from the start, and care as much about academic environment as about the department’s overall reach.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign vs Penn State for a biology major: which is better for undergrad research and pre-med opportunities?
Which is better for undergraduate biology research: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign or Rice University?
How do University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and UVA compare for graduate school placement after undergrad?
Which is better for government careers: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign or Georgetown?
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign vs University of Washington for informatics: which is better?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!