Is UMass Amherst or Rutgers better for economics?
I’m a high school senior trying to decide between UMass Amherst and Rutgers, and I’m leaning toward economics. I know both schools are solid, but I’m trying to figure out which one tends to have the stronger economics program overall for an undergrad who may want to study econ seriously and possibly use it for internships or grad school later.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is department style and location: Rutgers gives you a more research-heavy economics environment with easier access to the New York and New Jersey job market, while UMass Amherst offers a distinctive economics department with a broader range of perspectives and a strong academic identity of its own. For internships during the school year, Rutgers has a real edge because New Brunswick is much closer to NYC, Newark, and major employers. For students thinking about grad school, both can work, but they prepare you in somewhat different ways.
Rutgers is often the safer pick if you mean mainstream undergraduate economics with strong access to research faculty, quantitative coursework, and nearby internships. Its economics department is well known, and being part of a large research university can help if you want exposure to econometrics, policy, finance-adjacent work, or faculty research. The proximity to New York matters a lot for semester internships, networking, and alumni connections in business, government, and policy spaces.
UMass Amherst is especially notable because its economics department has a more distinctive reputation than many public universities. It is known for including heterodox approaches alongside standard economics training, which can be a real plus if you want to study political economy, inequality, labor, development, or economic history in a broader way. That can make the intellectual experience more interesting, but it also means you should look closely at the curriculum to be sure it matches the kind of economics training you want.
If your goal is serious undergrad econ with the most practical advantage for internships and a conventional path into grad school or finance and policy work, Rutgers has the stronger overall position. I would lean UMass only if you are specifically drawn to the department’s distinctive approach to economics and want that wider intellectual lens rather than a more standard economics setup.
Rutgers is often the safer pick if you mean mainstream undergraduate economics with strong access to research faculty, quantitative coursework, and nearby internships. Its economics department is well known, and being part of a large research university can help if you want exposure to econometrics, policy, finance-adjacent work, or faculty research. The proximity to New York matters a lot for semester internships, networking, and alumni connections in business, government, and policy spaces.
UMass Amherst is especially notable because its economics department has a more distinctive reputation than many public universities. It is known for including heterodox approaches alongside standard economics training, which can be a real plus if you want to study political economy, inequality, labor, development, or economic history in a broader way. That can make the intellectual experience more interesting, but it also means you should look closely at the curriculum to be sure it matches the kind of economics training you want.
If your goal is serious undergrad econ with the most practical advantage for internships and a conventional path into grad school or finance and policy work, Rutgers has the stronger overall position. I would lean UMass only if you are specifically drawn to the department’s distinctive approach to economics and want that wider intellectual lens rather than a more standard economics setup.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
UMass Amherst vs Rutgers for finance careers: which is better for recruiting and alumni network?
UMass Amherst vs Columbia for economics: which is the better choice?
UMass Amherst vs Rutgers: which has the stronger school reputation for employers and grad schools?
UMass Amherst vs University of Rochester for biology: which is better for undergrad research and pre-med prep?
Is UMass Amherst or UC Davis better for veterinary science?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!