UMass Amherst vs Colgate for economics: which is the better choice for an undergrad degree?
I'm trying to decide between UMass Amherst and Colgate for economics, and I'm mostly focused on which school would give me a stronger overall experience for the major. I care about the quality of the classes, access to professors, and whether the program actually helps with internships or grad school later.
I know both schools have different campus vibes and student sizes, but I'm trying to figure out which one is generally better for an economics major.
I know both schools have different campus vibes and student sizes, but I'm trying to figure out which one is generally better for an economics major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For economics specifically, Colgate is usually the stronger pick if you want small classes, close professor access, and a more individualized undergraduate experience. Its liberal arts setup means economics students are taught with undergrads at the center, and it is known for strong faculty interaction, discussion-based classes, and solid placement into finance, consulting, policy, and graduate study. If your priority is being known well by professors and getting detailed mentorship for research, recommendations, and advising, Colgate has a real edge.
Colgate tends to fit the student who wants economics in a classic liberal arts environment rather than a large preprofessional system. You are more likely to have seminar-style courses earlier, easier access to office hours, and a department where faculty involvement in your academic path is a normal part of the experience. That can matter a lot if you may pursue a PhD, a policy-oriented master’s, or competitive internships where strong faculty recommendations help.
UMass Amherst makes more sense for a student who wants the resources and flexibility of a large public research university. The economics department is well regarded, and the broader university gives you more course variety, more neighboring departments to draw from, and more scale in research activity, student organizations, and recruiting. If you are proactive, UMass can absolutely lead to strong outcomes, but you will usually need to navigate a bigger system and put more effort into building relationships with professors.
For internships, UMass benefits from size and alumni reach, especially if you take advantage of the larger campus ecosystem. Colgate’s network is smaller but often very engaged, and that can be especially valuable in fields like finance and consulting where alumni connections can open doors. For grad school preparation, both can work well, but Colgate often makes the path more personal, while UMass can offer more breadth and a stronger large-university research atmosphere.
On the exact factors you named, especially class quality in a small setting and professor access, Colgate comes out ahead for most economics majors.
Colgate tends to fit the student who wants economics in a classic liberal arts environment rather than a large preprofessional system. You are more likely to have seminar-style courses earlier, easier access to office hours, and a department where faculty involvement in your academic path is a normal part of the experience. That can matter a lot if you may pursue a PhD, a policy-oriented master’s, or competitive internships where strong faculty recommendations help.
UMass Amherst makes more sense for a student who wants the resources and flexibility of a large public research university. The economics department is well regarded, and the broader university gives you more course variety, more neighboring departments to draw from, and more scale in research activity, student organizations, and recruiting. If you are proactive, UMass can absolutely lead to strong outcomes, but you will usually need to navigate a bigger system and put more effort into building relationships with professors.
For internships, UMass benefits from size and alumni reach, especially if you take advantage of the larger campus ecosystem. Colgate’s network is smaller but often very engaged, and that can be especially valuable in fields like finance and consulting where alumni connections can open doors. For grad school preparation, both can work well, but Colgate often makes the path more personal, while UMass can offer more breadth and a stronger large-university research atmosphere.
On the exact factors you named, especially class quality in a small setting and professor access, Colgate comes out ahead for most economics majors.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
UMass Amherst vs Duke for biology: which is the better choice for an undergrad pre-med or research-focused student?
Colgate vs Cornell for engineering: which is the better choice for an undergrad engineering degree?
UMass Amherst vs Vanderbilt for biology: which is the better choice overall?
UMass Amherst vs Syracuse for psychology: which is the better choice?
UMass Amherst or UMass Boston for business: which is the better choice?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!