Is the University of Copenhagen harder to get into than Princeton?
I'm trying to understand how selective these two schools are in a general sense, not for any specific program or year.
I keep seeing both names come up, but I’m not sure how to compare the admissions difficulty between a Danish university and an Ivy League school.
I keep seeing both names come up, but I’m not sure how to compare the admissions difficulty between a Danish university and an Ivy League school.
3 hours ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
3 hours ago
No. Princeton is much harder to get into in an overall admissions sense.
Princeton uses a highly selective, holistic process for a very small entering class, and it turns away many applicants who already have top grades, rigorous coursework, and strong extracurricular profiles. For most students, especially international applicants, admission is extraordinarily competitive in a way that is not really comparable to a large public university system.
The University of Copenhagen works more like a national public university, where admission is often driven more by whether you meet the academic requirements for a specific program and, in many cases, by available seats and credential equivalency. That can still make some programs competitive, but the baseline question is usually whether you qualify for that course of study rather than whether you stand out across every dimension of your application.
Another big difference is scale and purpose. Copenhagen serves a broad public higher education role in Denmark and offers many programs with structured entry requirements, while Princeton is a small private university that builds a class through intensive selection. So in a general, school-wide comparison, Princeton is the tougher admit by a wide margin, even though certain University of Copenhagen programs can still be difficult for applicants who do not match the required academic background.
Princeton uses a highly selective, holistic process for a very small entering class, and it turns away many applicants who already have top grades, rigorous coursework, and strong extracurricular profiles. For most students, especially international applicants, admission is extraordinarily competitive in a way that is not really comparable to a large public university system.
The University of Copenhagen works more like a national public university, where admission is often driven more by whether you meet the academic requirements for a specific program and, in many cases, by available seats and credential equivalency. That can still make some programs competitive, but the baseline question is usually whether you qualify for that course of study rather than whether you stand out across every dimension of your application.
Another big difference is scale and purpose. Copenhagen serves a broad public higher education role in Denmark and offers many programs with structured entry requirements, while Princeton is a small private university that builds a class through intensive selection. So in a general, school-wide comparison, Princeton is the tougher admit by a wide margin, even though certain University of Copenhagen programs can still be difficult for applicants who do not match the required academic background.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Is UCLA harder to get into than MIT?
Is UCLA harder to get into than Penn State for undergraduate admissions?
Is Georgetown harder to get into than Fordham for undergraduate admissions?
Is University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign harder to get into than UT Austin for undergraduate admissions?
Is Georgia Tech harder to get into than UCLA for undergraduate admissions?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!