Is Georgetown harder to get into than Fordham for undergraduate admissions?
I’m comparing colleges and keep hearing that Georgetown is much harder to get into than Fordham, but I’m not sure how to think about that beyond reputation.
I know selectivity can mean different things, so I’m trying to understand whether one is generally considered more difficult overall for undergraduate admissions.
I know selectivity can mean different things, so I’m trying to understand whether one is generally considered more difficult overall for undergraduate admissions.
8 hours ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
8 hours ago
Yes. Georgetown is widely considered much harder to get into than Fordham for undergraduate admission. It draws a larger national and international applicant pool, and tends to expect a very strong academic record alongside a highly polished overall application.
Fordham is selective too, but it is typically a more accessible admit than Georgetown. A student who is competitive for Fordham is not automatically competitive for Georgetown, while many applicants who are realistic for Georgetown would also be strong candidates at Fordham.
The clearest way to think about it is by student profile. Georgetown is for the applicant with standout grades in a rigorous curriculum, strong writing, and a clear academic or extracurricular direction, especially in areas the school is known for such as politics, international affairs, government, business, or public service. It is the kind of place where even very strong students can still be denied because the bar is high across the board.
Fordham fits a student who still has solid academics and meaningful involvement, but may not need the same level of national-level competitiveness. It has strong programs, a respected name, and serious applicants, but the admissions process is not viewed in the same tier of difficulty as Georgetown’s.
So if your question is simply which school is tougher to access overall as an undergraduate applicant, the answer is Georgetown by a noticeable margin.
Fordham is selective too, but it is typically a more accessible admit than Georgetown. A student who is competitive for Fordham is not automatically competitive for Georgetown, while many applicants who are realistic for Georgetown would also be strong candidates at Fordham.
The clearest way to think about it is by student profile. Georgetown is for the applicant with standout grades in a rigorous curriculum, strong writing, and a clear academic or extracurricular direction, especially in areas the school is known for such as politics, international affairs, government, business, or public service. It is the kind of place where even very strong students can still be denied because the bar is high across the board.
Fordham fits a student who still has solid academics and meaningful involvement, but may not need the same level of national-level competitiveness. It has strong programs, a respected name, and serious applicants, but the admissions process is not viewed in the same tier of difficulty as Georgetown’s.
So if your question is simply which school is tougher to access overall as an undergraduate applicant, the answer is Georgetown by a noticeable margin.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Is Georgia Tech harder to get into than UCLA for undergraduate admissions?
Is UT Austin harder to get into than Vanderbilt for undergraduate admissions?
Is University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign harder to get into than UT Austin for undergraduate admissions?
Is UCLA harder to get into than Penn State for undergraduate admissions?
Is the University of Michigan or Georgetown University harder to get into?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!