UC Berkeley vs Yale for economics: which is better for undergrad economics?
I’m trying to decide between UC Berkeley and Yale for economics and keep seeing people mention both schools as strong options. I’m mainly interested in how they compare for undergrad economics in terms of academics, research opportunities, and how well the program prepares students for grad school or jobs.
I’m not looking at cost here, just the overall strength of the economics program and the student experience in that major.
I’m not looking at cost here, just the overall strength of the economics program and the student experience in that major.
15 hours ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
15 hours ago
For undergraduate economics, both are excellent, but they offer very different experiences. UC Berkeley is especially compelling for a student who wants to be in a large, high-powered economics environment with deep faculty strength, close proximity to policy and industry networks in the Bay Area, and a department that is widely respected in academic economics. Yale stands out more for a student who wants a smaller undergraduate setting, easier access to professors, and a college experience where economics is strong but embedded in a broader liberal arts structure.
Berkeley tends to appeal to students who want intensity and scale. Its economics department has a major research presence, and the campus culture around quantitative social science, public policy, data, and adjacent fields like math, statistics, and computer science is especially strong. For someone considering a PhD, Berkeley can be a very serious place to build technical preparation, especially if they proactively seek out advanced coursework, research assistant roles, and strong faculty relationships.
That said, Berkeley’s size matters. Intro and core economics classes can be large, and the major can feel less personalized unless you take initiative. Students who thrive there are usually comfortable navigating a big public university and finding opportunities independently.
Yale is a better match for someone who wants economics in a more intimate undergraduate environment. The department is excellent, the curriculum is rigorous, and undergraduates often find it easier to build close relationships with faculty because classes are smaller and advising is more accessible. That can be especially valuable for thesis work, recommendation letters, and research mentoring, all of which matter for grad school.
For job outcomes, both schools place well, but in somewhat different ways. Berkeley benefits from its scale and location, with strong connections to tech, consulting, finance, and policy-oriented work. Yale offers powerful alumni access and a more residential, high-touch student experience that can make recruiting and mentorship feel more structured.
If the question is pure economics department strength, Berkeley arguably has the edge in raw disciplinary heft and research ecosystem. If the question is undergraduate experience within the major, many students would find Yale more supportive and easier to navigate.
Berkeley tends to appeal to students who want intensity and scale. Its economics department has a major research presence, and the campus culture around quantitative social science, public policy, data, and adjacent fields like math, statistics, and computer science is especially strong. For someone considering a PhD, Berkeley can be a very serious place to build technical preparation, especially if they proactively seek out advanced coursework, research assistant roles, and strong faculty relationships.
That said, Berkeley’s size matters. Intro and core economics classes can be large, and the major can feel less personalized unless you take initiative. Students who thrive there are usually comfortable navigating a big public university and finding opportunities independently.
Yale is a better match for someone who wants economics in a more intimate undergraduate environment. The department is excellent, the curriculum is rigorous, and undergraduates often find it easier to build close relationships with faculty because classes are smaller and advising is more accessible. That can be especially valuable for thesis work, recommendation letters, and research mentoring, all of which matter for grad school.
For job outcomes, both schools place well, but in somewhat different ways. Berkeley benefits from its scale and location, with strong connections to tech, consulting, finance, and policy-oriented work. Yale offers powerful alumni access and a more residential, high-touch student experience that can make recruiting and mentorship feel more structured.
If the question is pure economics department strength, Berkeley arguably has the edge in raw disciplinary heft and research ecosystem. If the question is undergraduate experience within the major, many students would find Yale more supportive and easier to navigate.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
WashU vs UCLA for economics: which is better for undergrad opportunities and outcomes?
UC Berkeley vs Northeastern for computer science: which is better for undergrad CS?
UC Berkeley vs UCLA for political science: which is better for an undergrad interested in political science?
UC Berkeley vs UChicago for economics: which is better for undergraduate economics?
UC Berkeley vs Cornell for engineering: which is better for undergrad?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!