Is USC harder to get into than Princeton?
I’m trying to get a realistic sense of how selective these schools are because both are on my list, but they feel very different in terms of admissions. I know they’re both extremely competitive, and I’m trying to understand which one is generally harder to get into overall.
2 weeks ago
•
0 views
Sundial Team
2 weeks ago
The biggest practical tradeoff is that USC is highly selective, but Princeton operates at an even narrower level of admissions difficulty overall. Princeton has one of the most restrictive admissions processes in the country, while USC, though still very hard to enter, admits a broader range of students across more programs and a much larger undergraduate population. In plain terms, if both are on your list, Princeton should be treated as the steeper admissions climb.
Part of the difference is institutional scale and mission. USC enrolls far more undergraduates and includes many distinct schools and majors, which creates more entry points across the university, even though some programs can be especially competitive. Princeton is smaller, more tightly sized, and its applicant pool is extraordinarily strong across the board.
The applicant profile also matters. At USC, strong students absolutely get turned away every year, especially for popular programs like business, cinema, or engineering. But Princeton’s level of selectivity is more intense overall, and even applicants with near-perfect academics and top extracurriculars are still facing very long odds.
So Princeton is harder to get into than USC in the overall admissions sense. That does not make USC easy or even close to easy, but the realistic way to frame it is that USC is a reach for many high-achieving applicants, while Princeton is an ultra-reach for almost everyone.
Part of the difference is institutional scale and mission. USC enrolls far more undergraduates and includes many distinct schools and majors, which creates more entry points across the university, even though some programs can be especially competitive. Princeton is smaller, more tightly sized, and its applicant pool is extraordinarily strong across the board.
The applicant profile also matters. At USC, strong students absolutely get turned away every year, especially for popular programs like business, cinema, or engineering. But Princeton’s level of selectivity is more intense overall, and even applicants with near-perfect academics and top extracurriculars are still facing very long odds.
So Princeton is harder to get into than USC in the overall admissions sense. That does not make USC easy or even close to easy, but the realistic way to frame it is that USC is a reach for many high-achieving applicants, while Princeton is an ultra-reach for almost everyone.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Is Cornell harder to get into than the University of Washington?
Is Rice harder to get into than MIT?
Is Notre Dame harder to get into than Harvard for college admissions?
Is the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign harder to get into than Notre Dame for undergraduate admissions?
Is USC or Stanford harder to get into?
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!