Auburn vs. Penn State: Which Has Better Undergraduate Aerospace Engineering Research Opportunities?
I’m a high school senior deciding between Auburn and Penn State for aerospace engineering. I’m especially interested in getting involved in research as an undergraduate, possibly in propulsion, aircraft design, or space systems. Which school offers stronger opportunities for students to participate in aerospace engineering research?
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The main tradeoff is Penn State’s much broader research ecosystem and federal-lab connections versus Auburn’s smaller aerospace program, where it can be easier to build direct relationships with professors and join a lab early. For propulsion, aircraft design, and space-related systems, Penn State offers more distinct research groups and a larger volume of aerospace-adjacent work across engineering. Its aerospace department also benefits from connections to the Applied Research Laboratory and the Vertical Lift Research Center of Excellence, creating unusual exposure to rotorcraft, autonomy, aerodynamics, controls, and defense-related engineering research.
Penn State is particularly strong for a student who wants multiple possible research directions before narrowing a focus. There are opportunities connected to propulsion and fluid mechanics, aircraft and rotorcraft design, structures, unmanned systems, and space-oriented engineering. One important practical detail is that some Applied Research Laboratory projects can have citizenship, export-control, or clearance restrictions, so not every project will be equally accessible to every undergraduate. Still, the overall number of faculty labs, research centers, and graduate-student-led projects gives undergraduates many entry points.
Auburn has credible undergraduate research options, especially for students who take initiative early. Its aerospace faculty conduct work in areas such as aerodynamics, propulsion, flight dynamics and controls, and aerospace structures, while Auburn’s National Center for Additive Manufacturing Excellence can be valuable for students interested in aircraft components, advanced materials, and manufacturing. Auburn’s design teams and hands-on engineering culture may also make it easier to connect classroom learning with project work.
For the specific interests you listed, Penn State has the stronger overall undergraduate research platform because of its greater breadth, specialized aerospace centers, and deeper research infrastructure. Auburn can still be an excellent choice if you prefer a more personal program and are prepared to contact professors early, but Penn State provides more ways to explore propulsion, aircraft design, and space systems before committing to one niche.
Penn State is particularly strong for a student who wants multiple possible research directions before narrowing a focus. There are opportunities connected to propulsion and fluid mechanics, aircraft and rotorcraft design, structures, unmanned systems, and space-oriented engineering. One important practical detail is that some Applied Research Laboratory projects can have citizenship, export-control, or clearance restrictions, so not every project will be equally accessible to every undergraduate. Still, the overall number of faculty labs, research centers, and graduate-student-led projects gives undergraduates many entry points.
Auburn has credible undergraduate research options, especially for students who take initiative early. Its aerospace faculty conduct work in areas such as aerodynamics, propulsion, flight dynamics and controls, and aerospace structures, while Auburn’s National Center for Additive Manufacturing Excellence can be valuable for students interested in aircraft components, advanced materials, and manufacturing. Auburn’s design teams and hands-on engineering culture may also make it easier to connect classroom learning with project work.
For the specific interests you listed, Penn State has the stronger overall undergraduate research platform because of its greater breadth, specialized aerospace centers, and deeper research infrastructure. Auburn can still be an excellent choice if you prefer a more personal program and are prepared to contact professors early, but Penn State provides more ways to explore propulsion, aircraft design, and space systems before committing to one niche.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Auburn vs. NC State: Which Is Better for an Undergraduate Statistics Degree?
Auburn vs. Florida State: Which offers stronger undergraduate psychology research opportunities?
Yale vs. Duke: Which University Offers Better Undergraduate Research Opportunities?
Is Auburn University or Virginia Tech better for aerospace engineering?
Auburn vs. Texas A&M: Which Is Better for Aerospace Engineering?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!