How do undergraduate research opportunities compare at Emory University and MIT?

I’m a high school senior interested in studying biology and possibly pursuing research as an undergraduate. I’m comparing Emory and MIT and want to understand how accessible meaningful research opportunities are for undergraduates at each school.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is that MIT has a more formal, campus-wide system for getting undergraduates into research early, while Emory offers especially strong access to biomedical, public-health, and clinical-adjacent research within a broader university environment. At MIT, the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP) makes it common for students to find paid or for-credit positions in faculty labs, often beginning in the first year. Emory students can also join labs early, but the process tends to rely more on identifying faculty whose work fits, contacting them, and building relationships through courses and departmental networks.

For biology, MIT provides unusually deep exposure to quantitative and technology-driven research: molecular biology, genetics, computational biology, bioengineering, neuroscience, and biological data science. Its research culture is highly visible in undergraduate life, and many labs are accustomed to supervising undergraduates on defined projects. The pace can be intense, and students interested primarily in patient-facing, population-health, or clinical research may find a narrower institutional emphasis than at Emory.

Emory has substantial biomedical research through its biology department, medical school, public health school, and affiliated research centers. Its Atlanta setting can be particularly valuable for infectious disease, epidemiology, global health, neuroscience, cancer research, and translational work. Strong opportunities exist, but students may need to be more proactive about reaching out, following up, and seeking summer funding or structured research programs. A student who builds faculty connections early can still graduate with sustained, meaningful lab experience and strong mentorship.

For a student whose priority is the most built-in, undergraduate-centered pathway into lab research, especially quantitative or engineering-linked biology, MIT has the clearer advantage. For someone drawn to biology connected with medicine, public health, and clinical or population questions, Emory can be the more compelling research setting, provided they are prepared to take initiative in finding a lab.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!