Michigan State vs. George Washington University for studying politics: Which is the better choice?

For a student who wants politics to be part of daily life and hopes to intern with federal agencies, congressional offices, advocacy groups, think tanks, or campaigns during the academic year, George Washington University offers the more distinctive environment. Its Washington, D.C., location makes those opportunities unusually accessible without taking a semester away from campus, and political science students can build professional connections early. GW is especially compelling for interests in national government, international affairs, elections, public policy advocacy, and political communications.

Michigan State is an excellent fit for someone who wants a larger, more traditional campus experience while still having meaningful access to government and policy work. East Lansing is next to Michigan’s state capital, so students can pursue internships and networking in state government, legislative offices, public-interest organizations, and policy-focused nonprofits. MSU’s James Madison College is a particular draw: its small, residential, interdisciplinary programs in political theory, public policy, international relations, and social relations can provide a more close-knit academic setting within a large university.

GW’s urban, professionally oriented environment rewards students who are prepared to apply, network, and manage the pace and costs of D.C. living. MSU may be more appealing to a student who values campus community, Big Ten school spirit, broad course offerings, and the chance to explore politics alongside other interests. It can also be particularly sensible for students considering state-level policy, public administration, or law, especially when its net cost is substantially lower. Between two similarly affordable offers, choose GW for immersion in national political institutions and MSU for a fuller residential university experience with strong access to Michigan government.