Is Arizona State or the University of Rochester better for undergraduate research opportunities?

I’m trying to compare these two schools mainly for research as an undergraduate, not just overall reputation. I’m interested in how easy it is to get involved with faculty projects, lab access, and whether students can start research early.

I’m a high school senior trying to figure out which school would give me a stronger research experience before I apply.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For undergraduate research specifically, the University of Rochester usually offers the more direct path to faculty mentorship and early involvement, especially if you want a smaller university where undergrads are a central part of the academic culture. Rochester is well known for integrating research into the undergraduate experience, and its size can make it easier to build relationships with professors relatively early. It also has strong access to research tied to its medical center, engineering, optics, neuroscience, and natural sciences.

Rochester tends to fit the student who wants close contact with faculty and is comfortable being proactive in a more intimate academic setting. If you are picturing yourself emailing professors early, joining a lab in your first or second year, and working closely with a smaller research group, Rochester has an advantage. Its open curriculum also gives students flexibility to explore across fields, which can help if your interests overlap areas like biology and public health or physics and engineering.

Arizona State fits a different kind of student well: someone who wants a huge research ecosystem with lots of labs, centers, and initiative-driven opportunities, and who does not mind navigating a very large university to find them. ASU invests heavily in research, and because of its scale, there are opportunities in areas ranging from sustainability and space-related work to engineering, psychology, and biomedical topics. Students who are assertive, organized, and willing to search across departments can absolutely build a strong research record there.

The tradeoff is that at ASU, the size that creates so many options can also make the process feel less automatic. You may need to be more deliberate about finding the right professor, campus, or program. At Rochester, there are fewer total labs than at ASU, but undergraduates are often more visible within them.

So if your main question is where an undergraduate is more likely to get hands-on research access quickly and form close faculty connections, Rochester has the clearer edge. If you want the breadth of a major public research university and are confident you will chase opportunities actively, ASU can work very well too.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!