Williams or UChicago for undergraduate research opportunities?

I’m trying to compare Williams and UChicago mainly for research as an undergrad. I know both have strong academics, but I’m more interested in which school makes it easier to find research opportunities, especially early on.

I’m a high school senior looking at colleges where I could get involved in real faculty-led research and not just compete with a huge crowd.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is access versus scale: Williams tends to make faculty contact and early involvement much easier because it is small and undergraduate-focused, while UChicago offers a much larger research ecosystem with more labs, institutes, and specialized projects but can require more initiative to navigate. If your priority is getting noticed quickly by professors and finding a place in research early, Williams has a real advantage. If your priority is the breadth of available fields and the chance to plug into a major research university, UChicago has more sheer volume.

At Williams, there are no PhD students competing for most faculty attention, which matters a lot for undergraduates. Professors are used to working directly with students, and research often grows out of classes, office hours, or summer programs in a pretty accessible way. For many students, that means earlier hands-on work and a clearer path to becoming genuinely involved rather than waiting in line behind graduate students or postdocs.

UChicago absolutely offers serious undergraduate research, and in some disciplines, especially in the sciences, economics, and social sciences, the range of opportunities is far broader. You get access to a major research university environment, substantial faculty scholarship, and a wider set of labs and centers. The catch is that the process can be less automatic: you may need to email more professors, sort through more options, and be proactive about finding the right fit.

For someone specifically worried about competing with a huge crowd, Williams is usually the easier place to break in early. The small size and undergraduate emphasis reduce a lot of the friction that students sometimes feel at larger universities. UChicago can absolutely deliver more advanced or specialized research options once you find your lane, but Williams is often the smoother path to meaningful faculty-led research from the start.

So for ease of access, especially in the first year or two, I’d lean Williams. For maximum range and research infrastructure, UChicago has the edge, but it asks more of you to unlock it.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!