Which is better for biology: Howard or Emory for an undergraduate student?

For undergraduate biology specifically, Emory is usually the stronger academic option. Its biology program is broader in course offerings, more deeply connected to major research and medical institutions in Atlanta, and especially attractive for students interested in lab research, neuroscience, public health, or pre-med pathways. Howard is still a very meaningful choice for biology, particularly for students who want a strong Black intellectual community, smaller-department feel, and access to health-related opportunities in Washington, DC.

Emory tends to fit the student who wants a research-heavy environment and a lot of specialization within biology. The department offers multiple subfields and benefits from ties to Emory School of Medicine, Rollins School of Public Health, and nearby clinical and research settings. For undergrads, that can translate into more labs, more faculty doing high-volume research, and more chances to explore different corners of biology before settling on a focus.

Howard makes a lot of sense for a student who wants biology in a mission-driven, community-centered setting. It has a long track record of preparing Black students for medicine, science, and health professions, and its location creates access to hospitals, federal agencies, and DC-based internships. The biology experience there may feel more personal and grounded in mentorship, especially for students who value being in an HBCU environment where that cultural and academic support is central, not incidental.

If your question is strictly which biology program is stronger on academics and breadth of opportunity, Emory has the edge. If what matters is studying biology in a place with Howard’s specific history, community, and pipeline into health professions, then Howard can be the more compelling undergraduate experience even if Emory is stronger on pure program depth.