University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign vs UCLA: which has better return on investment for undergraduates?
I’m trying to compare these two schools from a financial perspective, not just a rankings perspective. I’m interested in how much value a degree from each one tends to provide after graduation compared with the cost of attending.
I know both are strong public universities, but I’m wondering which one is generally seen as the better return on investment for an undergraduate student.
I know both are strong public universities, but I’m wondering which one is generally seen as the better return on investment for an undergraduate student.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
UIUC usually comes out ahead on return on investment for undergraduates, mainly because its total cost is often meaningfully lower while its outcomes are still excellent. It has especially strong placement in engineering, computer science, business, and data-related fields, where starting salaries can be very high. UCLA offers outstanding outcomes too, but from a pure cost-versus-earnings lens, the price difference often makes UIUC the more favorable value.
The biggest differentiator is cost structure. For many students, especially nonresidents, UCLA can be expensive once tuition and Los Angeles living costs are added in. UIUC is not cheap, particularly for out-of-state students, but Urbana-Champaign is usually much less expensive to live in than Westwood, and that matters over four years.
The second differentiator is how directly each school feeds into high-paying undergraduate majors. UIUC has an unusually strong reputation with employers in engineering, CS, accounting, finance, and related technical fields, and that often translates into a very fast payback period after graduation. UCLA has plenty of strong majors and excellent recruiting, but its undergraduate strength is spread across more fields, including many that are less immediately high-paying.
A third factor is opportunity cost during college. At UIUC, lower day-to-day expenses can make it easier to avoid extra borrowing and sometimes easier to take advantage of internships, research, or recruiting without the same financial pressure that comes with living in Los Angeles. UCLA does provide access to a huge job market and powerful alumni reach, but those advantages do not always outweigh the added cost if the question is strictly ROI.
One important exception is residency and major. A California resident paying in-state tuition at UCLA may find UCLA extremely competitive financially, and for some fields tied to media, entertainment, certain life sciences paths, or LA-based networking, UCLA can close the gap or even pull ahead. But absent a special pricing advantage, UIUC is more often the cleaner ROI choice.
The biggest differentiator is cost structure. For many students, especially nonresidents, UCLA can be expensive once tuition and Los Angeles living costs are added in. UIUC is not cheap, particularly for out-of-state students, but Urbana-Champaign is usually much less expensive to live in than Westwood, and that matters over four years.
The second differentiator is how directly each school feeds into high-paying undergraduate majors. UIUC has an unusually strong reputation with employers in engineering, CS, accounting, finance, and related technical fields, and that often translates into a very fast payback period after graduation. UCLA has plenty of strong majors and excellent recruiting, but its undergraduate strength is spread across more fields, including many that are less immediately high-paying.
A third factor is opportunity cost during college. At UIUC, lower day-to-day expenses can make it easier to avoid extra borrowing and sometimes easier to take advantage of internships, research, or recruiting without the same financial pressure that comes with living in Los Angeles. UCLA does provide access to a huge job market and powerful alumni reach, but those advantages do not always outweigh the added cost if the question is strictly ROI.
One important exception is residency and major. A California resident paying in-state tuition at UCLA may find UCLA extremely competitive financially, and for some fields tied to media, entertainment, certain life sciences paths, or LA-based networking, UCLA can close the gap or even pull ahead. But absent a special pricing advantage, UIUC is more often the cleaner ROI choice.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign vs University of Michigan for value: which offers better return on investment?
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign vs UCLA for city access: which has better access to a major city?
Which has a better overall reputation: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign or UCLA?
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign vs UCLA for campus atmosphere: which feels more lively and social?
Which has better school spirit, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign or Indiana University Bloomington?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!