Arizona State vs Loyola Marymount for entrepreneurship: which is better for students interested in starting a business?

For an undergraduate focused on entrepreneurship, Arizona State usually offers the bigger startup ecosystem and more built-in opportunities to experiment early. ASU has a very visible innovation culture, strong ties to the Phoenix business community, and a scale that tends to produce more incubators, competitions, venture programs, and cross-campus entrepreneurship activity. Loyola Marymount can still be a very good option, but it tends to make more sense for a student who wants a smaller, more personal environment and values the Los Angeles network.

ASU fits the student who wants lots of ways to try things, even if that means navigating a larger university. Its business school and university-wide innovation initiatives make entrepreneurship feel embedded across campus rather than limited to one niche program. For someone who wants to launch projects, meet many collaborators, and tap into a broad alumni and employer base in a fast-growing metro area, ASU has an edge.

LMU is more appealing for a student who learns best in smaller classes and wants closer faculty access while exploring business ideas. Its location in Los Angeles is a real asset, especially if your entrepreneurial interests connect to entertainment, media, branding, social impact, or consumer-facing startups. At LMU, the experience can feel more curated and relationship-driven, which some students prefer when developing confidence and finding mentors.

If the main question is where you are more likely to find volume, infrastructure, and campus-wide momentum around entrepreneurship, I would lean ASU. If your version of entrepreneurship is shaped by close mentorship, a smaller campus culture, and LA-specific industries, LMU has a compelling case.