Is Amherst or Princeton better for biology as an undergraduate?

I’m trying to compare these two schools for a biology major and I keep seeing both come up as strong options. I want to know which one is generally considered better for undergrad biology in terms of the actual academic experience, not just overall reputation.

I’m especially trying to understand the difference in how each school supports biology students and what the major feels like there.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
Princeton has the edge for undergraduate biology if you are comparing the academic experience of the major itself. Its biology-related departments are larger, the research infrastructure is deeper, and undergraduates have access to a broader range of advanced coursework, lab groups, and specialized facilities. For a student who wants a more expansive biology ecosystem, Princeton usually offers more built-in opportunities within the discipline.

One major difference is scale inside the sciences. Princeton supports biology through multiple closely connected departments and institutes, including molecular biology, ecology and evolutionary biology, genomics, neuroscience connections, and major research centers. That means more upper-level choices, more subfields represented on campus, and more ways to move between classroom learning and active research without leaving the university.

Research access is another real separator. Amherst does a very good job involving undergraduates in faculty work, and its small size can make mentoring especially personal. But Princeton combines strong undergraduate access with a much larger research enterprise, so biology students can plug into more labs, more equipment-intensive work, and more specialized projects earlier and in greater variety.

The major can also feel different day to day. Amherst’s biology experience is often more intimate and discussion-oriented, with very close faculty contact and a liberal arts structure that makes interdisciplinary exploration especially easy. Princeton still offers strong teaching and advising, but the biology curriculum tends to feel more like being trained within a full-scale research university science environment, which is often what students mean when they ask which place is stronger for biology itself.

Amherst’s biggest academic advantage is not that its biology program is broader, but that the classes and faculty relationships can feel unusually close-knit. If you know you learn best in very small settings and want biology in a pure liberal arts college atmosphere, that can matter a lot. But on the biology-specific question, Princeton is more often seen as offering the richer undergraduate platform.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!