American University vs Boston College for economics: which is better for an undergraduate economics major?

For an undergraduate economics major, Boston College usually has the edge if you want a more traditionally strong economics department, a campus-centered college experience, and a clearer pipeline into finance, consulting, and economics graduate study. American University stands out more for students who want economics tied closely to public policy, government, international affairs, and internships during the school year. Both can work well, but they serve somewhat different versions of “economics.”

Boston College is a strong fit for the student who wants economics as a rigorous social science with solid quantitative training and broad employer recognition. If you think you may pair economics with math, business-related interests, or eventual grad study, BC tends to feel more academically and professionally streamlined.

American fits the student who wants to study economics in constant conversation with Washington, DC. If you are excited by federal agencies, think tanks, nonprofits, international organizations, and policy research, AU’s location is a major advantage because internships can be part of your semester rhythm rather than mainly a summer plan. Its economics experience often feels more applied and policy-oriented, especially for students interested in development, political economy, regulation, or public-sector work.

For pure undergraduate economics strength, I would lean Boston College. For economics plus public policy and in-semester internship access, I would lean American. If your idea of success after college is analyst roles, private-sector recruiting, or a stronger traditional economics academic environment, BC is likely the more advantageous choice. If your goal is to build a resume through DC-based internships and connect economics directly to government and international affairs, AU may line up better with what you want day to day.