Amherst or Brown for creative writing: which is stronger for an undergraduate writer?
I'm a high school senior who wants to keep writing seriously in college, especially creative writing and fiction. Amherst and Brown are both on my list, but I keep seeing different opinions about which one is better for writers.
I'm trying to understand which school has the stronger overall environment for a student who wants to grow as a creative writer.
I'm trying to understand which school has the stronger overall environment for a student who wants to grow as a creative writer.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
Brown has the edge for an undergraduate writer who wants the deepest, most flexible creative writing environment. Its Literary Arts program is one of the most distinctive undergraduate writing programs in the country, and Brown’s open curriculum makes it much easier to build a college experience around fiction workshops, literature, and adjacent arts without getting squeezed by core requirements. Providence also gives you a larger literary and arts scene than Amherst’s quieter setting.
The biggest differentiator is Brown’s actual writing infrastructure. Literary Arts is not just a few workshop electives tucked into an English department; it is a well-established program with a strong identity, serious faculty, and a culture where creative writing is central rather than peripheral. For a student who already knows they want to keep writing seriously, that matters because the peer group is more likely to include many students who are equally committed to fiction, poetry, and hybrid work.
Brown also gives you more curricular freedom to shape your education around writing. The open curriculum lets you combine workshops with literature, translation, theater, visual art, film, history, or philosophy in a way that can really feed fiction writing. That flexibility is especially valuable for writers, since the best undergraduate growth often comes from reading widely and drawing material from different disciplines rather than following a narrow sequence.
Amherst is still excellent, and its strengths are real: small classes, close faculty attention, and a highly intellectual culture built around discussion and reading. If what you want most is an intimate liberal arts setting where professors know you well and your writing develops alongside very serious literary study, Amherst can be outstanding. But for creative writing specifically, Brown usually offers the more robust ecosystem, with more visible institutional support for undergraduate writers and more room to organize your whole education around the work of becoming one.
The biggest differentiator is Brown’s actual writing infrastructure. Literary Arts is not just a few workshop electives tucked into an English department; it is a well-established program with a strong identity, serious faculty, and a culture where creative writing is central rather than peripheral. For a student who already knows they want to keep writing seriously, that matters because the peer group is more likely to include many students who are equally committed to fiction, poetry, and hybrid work.
Brown also gives you more curricular freedom to shape your education around writing. The open curriculum lets you combine workshops with literature, translation, theater, visual art, film, history, or philosophy in a way that can really feed fiction writing. That flexibility is especially valuable for writers, since the best undergraduate growth often comes from reading widely and drawing material from different disciplines rather than following a narrow sequence.
Amherst is still excellent, and its strengths are real: small classes, close faculty attention, and a highly intellectual culture built around discussion and reading. If what you want most is an intimate liberal arts setting where professors know you well and your writing develops alongside very serious literary study, Amherst can be outstanding. But for creative writing specifically, Brown usually offers the more robust ecosystem, with more visible institutional support for undergraduate writers and more room to organize your whole education around the work of becoming one.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Amherst vs Brown for grad school: which is the better choice?
Amherst vs. Vassar for creative writing: which is better for an aspiring writer?
Amherst vs Northeastern for job placement: which college has stronger recruiting outcomes for students?
Amherst or Georgetown for political science: which is better for an undergraduate student?
Amherst or Tufts for international relations: which is better for undergraduate IR?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!