Amherst vs UPenn for economics: which is better for undergrad econ?
I’m trying to compare Amherst and UPenn for an economics major from an undergraduate perspective. I know both are strong schools, but I’m more interested in how the actual econ experience differs.
I’m mainly thinking about things like the strength of the major, class size, access to professors, and how well each school prepares students for internships, research, or grad school.
I’m mainly thinking about things like the strength of the major, class size, access to professors, and how well each school prepares students for internships, research, or grad school.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For undergraduate economics, Penn tends to offer the broader, more professionally connected experience, while Amherst offers the more intimate, discussion-driven one. Penn has a much larger economics ecosystem, including a major economics department in the College of Arts and Sciences plus Wharton’s presence on campus, which creates more course variety, faculty specialization, and finance-adjacent recruiting energy. Amherst stands out for small classes, very close faculty access, and an undergraduate-centered environment where professors are teaching with undergrads, not balancing that with large graduate programs.
Penn makes the most sense for a student who wants scale and options. You are more likely to find many upper-level electives, a wider spread of subfields, and more classmates interested in economics, business, policy, and quantitative work. That can be especially helpful if you want internships during the school year, exposure to employers in Philadelphia and the Northeast corridor, or a path that leans toward consulting, banking, policy, or data-oriented economics. Penn’s economics program is also strong preparation for PhD study, but the day-to-day feel is less insulated and more self-directed because the university is larger.
Amherst is especially attractive for a student who wants economics to feel personal and academic rather than pre-professional. Classes are often smaller, office hours are easier to build into real mentoring relationships, and it is simpler to stand out for research, recommendations, and thesis work. If you are the kind of student who learns best by talking through ideas, wants professors to know you well, and values a liberal arts setting where economics sits alongside strong training in writing, math, and social theory, Amherst is a very compelling place to study econ. That environment can be excellent for grad school preparation because close advising matters a lot.
For internships and recruiting, Penn has the clearer edge simply because of its size, location, alumni density, and employer access. For faculty interaction and undergraduate attention, Amherst has the edge. So the real question is whether you want economics embedded in a large, opportunity-rich university culture or in a small college where the major may feel more tailored and intellectually close-knit.
Penn makes the most sense for a student who wants scale and options. You are more likely to find many upper-level electives, a wider spread of subfields, and more classmates interested in economics, business, policy, and quantitative work. That can be especially helpful if you want internships during the school year, exposure to employers in Philadelphia and the Northeast corridor, or a path that leans toward consulting, banking, policy, or data-oriented economics. Penn’s economics program is also strong preparation for PhD study, but the day-to-day feel is less insulated and more self-directed because the university is larger.
Amherst is especially attractive for a student who wants economics to feel personal and academic rather than pre-professional. Classes are often smaller, office hours are easier to build into real mentoring relationships, and it is simpler to stand out for research, recommendations, and thesis work. If you are the kind of student who learns best by talking through ideas, wants professors to know you well, and values a liberal arts setting where economics sits alongside strong training in writing, math, and social theory, Amherst is a very compelling place to study econ. That environment can be excellent for grad school preparation because close advising matters a lot.
For internships and recruiting, Penn has the clearer edge simply because of its size, location, alumni density, and employer access. For faculty interaction and undergraduate attention, Amherst has the edge. So the real question is whether you want economics embedded in a large, opportunity-rich university culture or in a small college where the major may feel more tailored and intellectually close-knit.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Amherst vs. UPenn for finance careers: which is better for recruiting and alumni access?
Amherst vs UChicago for economics: which is better for an undergraduate student?
Amherst vs MIT for computer science: which is better for an undergrad CS major?
Amherst vs Columbia for economics: which is better for undergraduate economics majors?
Amherst or Colby for pre med: which is better for undergrad preparation?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!