UCLA vs Washington University in St. Louis for economics: which is better for an undergrad interested in economics?
I’m trying to narrow down my college list and I’m choosing between UCLA and Washington University in St. Louis for economics. I want to study something economics-related and I’m mostly thinking about the quality of the undergrad experience, not just overall school reputation.
I know both schools are strong, but I’m having a hard time figuring out which one is generally better for an economics major.
I know both schools are strong, but I’m having a hard time figuring out which one is generally better for an economics major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For an undergraduate focused on economics, UCLA makes more sense for the student who wants a large, high-energy public university with a very established economics ecosystem, broad course selection, and strong proximity to major job markets like Los Angeles. Washington University in St. Louis is often more appealing to the student who wants smaller classes sooner, more direct access to professors, and a more contained campus experience where advising can feel more personal. Both can prepare you well for grad school, consulting, finance, policy, or business-adjacent work, but the day-to-day experience is meaningfully different.
UCLA tends to suit students who are comfortable being proactive in a big system. Its economics department is well known, and the scale of the university creates lots of academic options, research activity, and student organizations tied to business, data, public policy, and finance. Being in LA also helps if you care about internships during the school year, especially in entertainment business, finance, tech, real estate, and policy-related spaces. The tradeoff is that intro and core classes can be large, and getting individualized attention may require more initiative.
WashU fits students who care a lot about classroom access and a more curated undergraduate environment. Economics there is strong, and many students benefit from easier faculty interaction, smaller discussion settings, and a campus culture that can feel less overwhelming than UCLA’s. If you are deciding partly based on teaching experience rather than sheer size of the department or city-based opportunities, WashU has a real advantage. It can be especially attractive for someone who wants economics in combination with business, statistics, political science, or pre-law interests in a flexible academic setting.
If your priority is the breadth of opportunities around economics and the energy of a major public university in a huge city, UCLA has the edge. If your priority is a more intimate undergraduate experience with closer mentorship and less competition for attention, WashU is often the more satisfying place to study economics.
UCLA tends to suit students who are comfortable being proactive in a big system. Its economics department is well known, and the scale of the university creates lots of academic options, research activity, and student organizations tied to business, data, public policy, and finance. Being in LA also helps if you care about internships during the school year, especially in entertainment business, finance, tech, real estate, and policy-related spaces. The tradeoff is that intro and core classes can be large, and getting individualized attention may require more initiative.
WashU fits students who care a lot about classroom access and a more curated undergraduate environment. Economics there is strong, and many students benefit from easier faculty interaction, smaller discussion settings, and a campus culture that can feel less overwhelming than UCLA’s. If you are deciding partly based on teaching experience rather than sheer size of the department or city-based opportunities, WashU has a real advantage. It can be especially attractive for someone who wants economics in combination with business, statistics, political science, or pre-law interests in a flexible academic setting.
If your priority is the breadth of opportunities around economics and the energy of a major public university in a huge city, UCLA has the edge. If your priority is a more intimate undergraduate experience with closer mentorship and less competition for attention, WashU is often the more satisfying place to study economics.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
UCLA vs University of Richmond for economics: which is better for undergrad placement and opportunities?
UCLA or Vanderbilt for neuroscience: which is the better choice for an undergrad interested in research and pre-med?
UCLA or UC Davis for pre-med: which is better for undergrad opportunities?
Which is better for economics, UCLA or UT Austin?
Is UCLA or UC Berkeley better for economics majors?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!