Princeton vs Berkeley for economics: which is better for an undergraduate economics major?

I’m trying to decide between Princeton and Berkeley for studying economics as an undergrad. Both seem strong, but I’m mainly trying to understand which school is generally better for economics as a major, especially in terms of academics and the overall student experience.

I know they’re very different schools, so I’m mostly looking for a straight comparison on the economics program itself.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale versus intimacy. Berkeley economics gives you access to a huge public-university ecosystem, a very large department, and exceptional breadth in economics and adjacent fields, while Princeton offers a much smaller undergraduate experience with closer faculty access, more individualized advising, and an overall academic environment built more around undergrads.

On the economics major itself, both are excellent, but they feel very different in practice. Berkeley is especially strong if you want lots of course options, a deep bench of faculty, and strong links to business, data science, public policy, and tech-oriented applications. Princeton’s department is also top-tier academically, but for undergraduates the standout advantage is usually the seminar-style learning, easier access to professors, and a campus structure where independent research and thesis work are more central.

For classroom experience, Princeton is typically the more personal place to study economics. Berkeley intro and core classes can be large, and students often need to be proactive about office hours, discussion sections, and finding mentorship. At Princeton, smaller scale often makes it easier to build relationships with professors and get detailed feedback on your work.

For opportunities, Berkeley has enormous intellectual range and a very strong surrounding ecosystem in the Bay Area. That can translate into plenty of internships, research exposure, and connections across finance, tech, and policy. Princeton, though, is unusually strong at supporting undergraduates directly through advising, funded research, and a senior thesis culture that can be especially valuable if you may consider grad school, policy, or analytically intensive work.

On student experience, Berkeley is more fast-paced and self-directed. Princeton tends to feel more residential and cohesive, with more built-in support. For an undergraduate economics major specifically, I would give Princeton the edge if you are judging the academic experience of the major itself, because the teaching environment is usually more undergraduate-focused and the access to mentorship is better. Berkeley is absolutely on the same level in academic firepower, but Princeton is often the better place to study economics as an undergrad day to day.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!