Tulane vs Northwestern for undergraduate research opportunities

I’m trying to decide between Tulane and Northwestern and research is a big factor for me. I want to know which school is generally better for getting involved in meaningful undergraduate research as a student.

I’m interested in starting research early and want a place where it is realistic to find opportunities and work closely with faculty.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale versus accessibility: Northwestern has a much larger research enterprise and more labs across fields, while Tulane can feel more approachable and relationship-driven, which can make it easier to get faculty attention early. If your priority is the widest range of active projects, major grants, and research infrastructure, Northwestern usually has the edge. If your priority is a smaller environment where professors may be easier to know personally, Tulane has a real advantage.

Northwestern is one of the strongest undergraduate research environments simply because of how much is happening there. It has major activity in engineering, chemistry, neuroscience, economics, psychology, journalism, and the social sciences, plus access to the broader Chicago area and a medical campus in downtown Chicago. That means more labs, more specialized subfields, and more chances to find a project that matches a very specific interest.

Tulane also offers solid undergraduate research, especially in public health, medicine-adjacent fields, environmental studies, tropical medicine, neuroscience, and work connected to New Orleans and the Gulf South. Its size can help undergrads stand out sooner, and students often find mentorship to be relatively accessible. For someone who wants close faculty interaction, that part of Tulane can be especially appealing.

For starting early, both schools make it realistic, but Northwestern tends to provide more total openings and a more developed research ecosystem. There are simply more faculty doing high-volume research, more centers and institutes, and more structured ways to plug in. Tulane may be less overwhelming and can reward initiative quickly, but the absolute number and breadth of opportunities are not at Northwestern’s level.

If research is a major deciding factor by itself, I would lean Northwestern. It gives you more depth, more variety, and more room to pivot if your interests change, while still offering plenty of chances to build close faculty relationships once you take initiative. Tulane is still a good place for undergraduate research, but Northwestern is the stronger pick on this specific question.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!