UMass Amherst vs UC Berkeley for economics: which is the better undergraduate choice?

I’m trying to decide between UMass Amherst and UC Berkeley for economics, and I keep seeing both schools mentioned as strong options. I want to compare them based on the overall strength of the econ program and how well each one would set me up for internships, grad school, or jobs after college.

I’m not asking about admissions chances, just which school is generally the stronger choice for an economics major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For economics specifically, UC Berkeley is the stronger undergraduate option for most students who want the deepest academic program and the widest range of recruiting opportunities. Berkeley’s economics department has a much bigger national and international reputation, the course offerings are broader and more advanced, and its location gives you unusually direct access to Bay Area internships, research, policy work, and finance-related opportunities.

Berkeley makes the most sense for a student who wants to be surrounded by a very intense academic environment and is comfortable being proactive in a large, competitive setting. If you are aiming at top PhD preparation, high-level quantitative economics, selective research roles, or recruiting pipelines into consulting, finance, tech, and policy, Berkeley tends to open more doors simply because of the strength of the department and the employer/alumni recognition attached to the name.

UMass Amherst is a very solid choice for a student who wants a strong economics education in a somewhat less pressurized environment. Its econ department is well known in some circles for distinctive strengths, including heterodox economics and political economy, so it can be especially appealing if you want an approach to economics that is not as narrowly conventional. It can still lead to internships, jobs, and graduate study, but you may need to be more intentional about building those opportunities compared with what is available around Berkeley.

For a student focused on pure upside in economics, Berkeley stands out because the academic ceiling is higher and the surrounding ecosystem is unusually rich. For a student who values a more manageable atmosphere, possibly lower cost, and a department with a somewhat different intellectual flavor, UMass Amherst can be a smart pick. But if the question is which school is more powerful overall for economics as an undergraduate major, the clearer answer is UC Berkeley.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!