Columbia vs Johns Hopkins for economics: which is better for an undergraduate economics major?

I’m trying to decide between Columbia and Johns Hopkins and I’m leaning toward economics. I know both are strong schools overall, but I’m mainly trying to understand which one is generally better for an undergrad who wants a solid economics education and good opportunities afterward.

I’m not looking at this from a ranking-only perspective. I want to know which school has the stronger economics department experience for a student who is serious about the major.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For an undergraduate who is serious about economics specifically, Columbia usually has the edge. Its economics department is larger, more established in the field, and unusually well positioned for undergrads because of the school’s location in New York, where internships, policy work, finance, consulting, and research-adjacent opportunities are much easier to access during the academic year. Columbia also tends to offer a deeper economics ecosystem, not just classes but stronger spillover into business, public policy, data, and quantitative social science.

Columbia makes the most sense for the student who wants economics to sit at the center of their college experience. If you are interested in macro, finance, political economy, international economics, or eventually graduate study, Columbia gives you a lot of intellectual range and a very visible pipeline into economics-related careers. Being in Manhattan matters here in a practical way, not just as a prestige factor. It is easier to build a resume with term-time internships, attend talks, and connect with alumni in economics-heavy fields.

Johns Hopkins fits a somewhat different student well. If you want a more contained campus feel, smaller-scale environment, and a university where economics is strong but not one of the most publicly defining academic identities of the school, Hopkins can still serve you very well. It is especially appealing if your interests lean toward quantitative work, applied research, or combinations like economics with public health, international studies, or data-heavy policy questions.

One practical difference is the surrounding academic culture. At Columbia, economics feels embedded in a broader network of finance, policy, law, and urban institutions.

So if your question is which school is stronger for undergraduate economics on its own terms, I would lean Columbia. Hopkins is a very good option, but Columbia is more likely to feel like the place where an ambitious econ major has the wider set of directly relevant opportunities.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!