How do University of Washington and Harvey Mudd compare for computer science?
I’m trying to decide between these two schools for CS and keep getting stuck on what actually matters day to day. I know they have very different sizes and campus cultures, but I’m not sure how that changes the CS experience.
I want to understand how they compare for class size, access to professors, and preparing for internships or jobs in tech.
I want to understand how they compare for class size, access to professors, and preparing for internships or jobs in tech.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For computer science, these schools create very different day-to-day experiences. University of Washington offers one of the deepest and most visible CS ecosystems in the country, with a large department, a major tech-city location in Seattle, and a huge range of courses, labs, and recruiting connections. Harvey Mudd is much smaller, much more undergraduate-centered, and much more personal, with close faculty access and a tightly knit academic environment built around math, science, and engineering.
University of Washington tends to fit the student who wants scale and momentum. If you like having many upper-level CS options, exposure to big research activity, and frequent contact with major tech employers, UW is hard to ignore. Being in Seattle matters in practical ways: internships, networking, company events, and alumni presence are woven into the local environment, so the path into tech recruiting can feel very direct.
The tradeoff is that UW can feel less personal. Intro and required courses are more likely to be large, and getting individualized attention can take more initiative. Office hours, research groups, and project teams are there, but you may need to seek them out in a big system. For some students that is energizing; for others it feels easy to get lost.
Harvey Mudd fits the student who wants CS in a small, intense, collaborative setting. Classes are far smaller, professors are much more accessible, and the college is designed around undergraduates rather than graduate programs. If day to day you want discussion-heavy classes, easier faculty relationships, and a campus where classmates are deeply engaged in technical work, Mudd stands out.
Mudd’s CS preparation is also excellent for internships and jobs, especially because employers know its rigor and because students often build strong quantitative and problem-solving skills across the curriculum. The main difference is not weak outcomes, but narrower scale: fewer total courses, a smaller department, and less of the giant-university feel. You still get access to the broader Claremont Colleges environment, which helps socially and academically, but the CS experience itself remains intentionally small.
University of Washington tends to fit the student who wants scale and momentum. If you like having many upper-level CS options, exposure to big research activity, and frequent contact with major tech employers, UW is hard to ignore. Being in Seattle matters in practical ways: internships, networking, company events, and alumni presence are woven into the local environment, so the path into tech recruiting can feel very direct.
The tradeoff is that UW can feel less personal. Intro and required courses are more likely to be large, and getting individualized attention can take more initiative. Office hours, research groups, and project teams are there, but you may need to seek them out in a big system. For some students that is energizing; for others it feels easy to get lost.
Harvey Mudd fits the student who wants CS in a small, intense, collaborative setting. Classes are far smaller, professors are much more accessible, and the college is designed around undergraduates rather than graduate programs. If day to day you want discussion-heavy classes, easier faculty relationships, and a campus where classmates are deeply engaged in technical work, Mudd stands out.
Mudd’s CS preparation is also excellent for internships and jobs, especially because employers know its rigor and because students often build strong quantitative and problem-solving skills across the curriculum. The main difference is not weak outcomes, but narrower scale: fewer total courses, a smaller department, and less of the giant-university feel. You still get access to the broader Claremont Colleges environment, which helps socially and academically, but the CS experience itself remains intentionally small.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
University of Washington vs Cambridge for computer science: which is better for undergraduate CS?
University of Washington vs UC San Diego for internships: which is better for computer science students?
Is UC Berkeley or Cal Poly better for computer science?
Which is better for computer science, Michigan or UIUC?
How do University of Washington and Imperial College London compare for engineering?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!