University of Washington vs Tufts for international relations: which is better for an undergraduate IR major?

I’m a high school junior trying to compare these two schools for international relations. Both seem appealing for different reasons, but I’m mainly trying to figure out which one is generally stronger for studying IR as an undergraduate.

I want to understand how they compare in terms of academics, reputation in the field, and opportunities that would matter for someone interested in diplomacy, policy, or international organizations.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For undergraduate international relations, Tufts usually has the clearer edge if you want a school whose identity and opportunities are tightly connected to diplomacy and policy. Its IR strength is closely tied to The Fletcher School, the undergraduate International Relations major is one of the school’s signature programs, and the Boston-area setting gives access to policy, nonprofit, and global affairs internships during the academic year. University of Washington is still a very solid option, especially if you want a large public university with strong regional and Asia-focused resources, but it is less defined nationally by IR in the same way.

Tufts tends to fit the student who wants IR to be central to their undergraduate experience from the start. The curriculum is well known for combining political science, economics, history, and language study, and the campus culture has a long-standing internationalist bent. That matters because classmates, faculty, speakers, and student organizations often cluster around global affairs in a way that can make the field feel especially visible and well supported.

It also suits someone aiming at diplomacy, foreign policy, development, or international organizations who wants a liberal arts environment with easier access to discussion-based classes and faculty mentoring. The Fletcher connection does not mean undergrads are taking over a graduate school, but it does help create a serious global affairs ecosystem around campus.

Washington makes more sense for a student who wants the scale and breadth of a major research university. Seattle offers real advantages for internationally oriented work, especially around the Pacific Rim, trade, technology policy, and Asia-related studies. UW has strong area studies resources, language offerings, and the kind of wide course catalog that can be valuable if your interests within IR are still evolving.

It is also appealing if cost matters, particularly if you are in-state, or if you want the energy and options of a large flagship university. A student interested in international political economy, regional studies, public policy, or combining IR-related work with another big field like computer science, environmental studies, or business may find UW especially attractive.

In reputation specifically for undergraduate IR, Tufts is more immediately associated with the field. In raw university resources and research breadth, UW is formidable, but for a student asking which school is more distinctly known for launching undergraduates into IR-related pathways, Tufts has the stronger profile.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!