Tufts vs Amherst for economics: which is better for undergrad econ?

I'm trying to decide between Tufts and Amherst and economics is one of the main things I'm considering. I know both are strong schools, but I want to understand which one is generally better for an economics major in terms of academics and overall undergrad experience.

I'm mainly interested in how each school supports econ students and how strong the program feels overall.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale and structure: Tufts gives you a larger university setting with more course variety and access to graduate-level resources, while Amherst offers a smaller liberal arts environment with very close faculty access and a stronger emphasis on discussion-based undergraduate teaching. For economics specifically, both schools are very well regarded, but the day-to-day experience can feel quite different because Amherst’s department is built almost entirely around undergraduates, while Tufts sits in a broader research university context.

Academically, Amherst has an especially strong reputation in economics for undergraduates. The department is prominent on campus, classes tend to be intellectually serious, and students often get very direct interaction with professors. If you value seminar-style learning, close advising, and a place where undergraduates are clearly the center of the academic model, Amherst has an edge.

Tufts is also a strong place to study econ, especially if you want a somewhat broader university experience. You may find more flexibility to connect economics with international relations, public policy, math, or quantitative work, and the larger campus ecosystem can create more variety in research, student organizations, and applied opportunities. For some students, that wider setup feels more dynamic than a small college environment.

For overall undergrad experience, the difference is less about quality and more about atmosphere. Amherst is smaller, more intimate, and more academically concentrated. Tufts is more mid-sized, socially broader, and often feels a bit more connected to city-oriented opportunities through the Boston area.

If the question is strictly which school is better for undergraduate economics, I’d give Amherst the slight advantage. Its econ program has a particularly strong undergraduate reputation, and the liberal arts structure tends to serve econ majors very well. Tufts is still an excellent option, especially if you want the larger-university feel and more interdisciplinary range alongside economics.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!