Vassar or George Washington for political science: which is better for an undergraduate student?
I’m trying to decide between Vassar and George Washington, and I’m interested in studying political science in college. Both schools seem like strong options, but they feel pretty different in terms of location, campus culture, and opportunities.
I want to know which one is generally the better choice for an undergrad who wants a strong political science experience.
I want to know which one is generally the better choice for an undergrad who wants a strong political science experience.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
George Washington has the edge for political science at the undergraduate level. Its location in Washington, DC creates day-to-day access to internships on Capitol Hill, at think tanks, federal agencies, nonprofits, and advocacy groups during the academic year, which is a major advantage if you want politics to be part of your weekly routine rather than something you mainly do in the summer. For many undergrads, that proximity turns classroom interest into direct experience much earlier.
The biggest difference is practical exposure. At GW, political science students can build a resume while classes are in session because the city is full of policy and government work within commuting distance. That matters in political science, where employer connections, internships, and familiarity with institutions often shape what you can do after college as much as the major itself.
Vassar’s strength is different: it offers a classic liberal arts environment with small classes, close faculty interaction, and a more intimate campus culture. If you want a political science education centered on discussion, writing, theory, and broad intellectual development, Vassar does that very well. But it is in Poughkeepsie, so the pipeline to constant in-semester political work is less immediate and usually requires more planning.
The campus atmosphere also changes the experience. GW feels more urban, professionally oriented, and politically saturated, with many students already plugged into policy, campaigns, or public affairs. Vassar is more residential and insulated, which can be great for focus and community, but it does not immerse you in the machinery of politics in the same direct way.
For an undergraduate specifically focused on political science, especially one who wants internships, networking, and real-world policy access from the start, George Washington is the more compelling option. Vassar is still an excellent choice for students who value the liberal arts setting first and political science within that framework.
The biggest difference is practical exposure. At GW, political science students can build a resume while classes are in session because the city is full of policy and government work within commuting distance. That matters in political science, where employer connections, internships, and familiarity with institutions often shape what you can do after college as much as the major itself.
Vassar’s strength is different: it offers a classic liberal arts environment with small classes, close faculty interaction, and a more intimate campus culture. If you want a political science education centered on discussion, writing, theory, and broad intellectual development, Vassar does that very well. But it is in Poughkeepsie, so the pipeline to constant in-semester political work is less immediate and usually requires more planning.
The campus atmosphere also changes the experience. GW feels more urban, professionally oriented, and politically saturated, with many students already plugged into policy, campaigns, or public affairs. Vassar is more residential and insulated, which can be great for focus and community, but it does not immerse you in the machinery of politics in the same direct way.
For an undergraduate specifically focused on political science, especially one who wants internships, networking, and real-world policy access from the start, George Washington is the more compelling option. Vassar is still an excellent choice for students who value the liberal arts setting first and political science within that framework.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Vassar vs George Washington for internship opportunities: which one is better for undergrads?
Rutgers vs American University for political science: which is the better choice for undergrad?
Vassar vs Cornell for biology: which is better for an undergraduate biology major?
Vassar vs Case Western for biology: which is better for an undergraduate student interested in biology research and pre-med?
Vassar vs UPenn for psychology: which is better for an undergraduate psych major?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!