Michigan vs George Washington for internships: which school gives better access to opportunities in D.C. and beyond?
I’m trying to decide between the University of Michigan and George Washington, and internships are a big factor for me. I know both schools have strong reputations, but I’m more interested in how easy it is to actually find and land good internships through each campus environment.
I’m especially curious about how their locations, alumni networks, and career support compare for students trying to get internships.
I’m especially curious about how their locations, alumni networks, and career support compare for students trying to get internships.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is proximity versus scale: George Washington puts you in Washington, D.C., where internships during the school year are built into campus life, while Michigan gives you a much larger university ecosystem, broader alumni reach, and stronger recruiting depth across more industries, even though many internships happen in the summer rather than alongside classes. At GW, being in Foggy Bottom means federal agencies, nonprofits, consulting firms, think tanks, media organizations, and advocacy groups are close enough for part-time semester internships. At Michigan, the advantage is not physical closeness to D.C. but the volume of employers, the size of the alumni base, and the reach of its brand well beyond one city.
For D.C.-specific access, GW has the clear edge. It is much easier there to take on internships during fall or spring, attend employer events in person, and build a local network gradually while classes are in session. That matters a lot if you want politics, public policy, international affairs, government relations, or nonprofit work, where repeated in-person exposure can turn into stronger professional connections.
Michigan is stronger if you want internships beyond D.C. in a wider mix of fields. Its recruiting infrastructure is especially robust for business, engineering, tech, finance, consulting, research, and large national employers that hire at scale. The Michigan alumni network is famously active, and the school’s size creates more student organizations, project teams, labs, and pre-professional communities that can help you build experience before applying.
Career support is solid at both schools, but it functions differently. GW benefits from location-driven access, where opportunity often comes from being physically near employers. Michigan benefits from institution-driven access, where large career fairs, employer pipelines, and alumni connections create a more structured internship market.
If your top priority is getting into D.C. during the academic year and staying closely tied to that ecosystem, GW makes that path more immediate. If you want the strongest overall platform for internships across D.C. and beyond, especially across multiple industries, Michigan is the more powerful long-term option.
For D.C.-specific access, GW has the clear edge. It is much easier there to take on internships during fall or spring, attend employer events in person, and build a local network gradually while classes are in session. That matters a lot if you want politics, public policy, international affairs, government relations, or nonprofit work, where repeated in-person exposure can turn into stronger professional connections.
Michigan is stronger if you want internships beyond D.C. in a wider mix of fields. Its recruiting infrastructure is especially robust for business, engineering, tech, finance, consulting, research, and large national employers that hire at scale. The Michigan alumni network is famously active, and the school’s size creates more student organizations, project teams, labs, and pre-professional communities that can help you build experience before applying.
Career support is solid at both schools, but it functions differently. GW benefits from location-driven access, where opportunity often comes from being physically near employers. Michigan benefits from institution-driven access, where large career fairs, employer pipelines, and alumni connections create a more structured internship market.
If your top priority is getting into D.C. during the academic year and staying closely tied to that ecosystem, GW makes that path more immediate. If you want the strongest overall platform for internships across D.C. and beyond, especially across multiple industries, Michigan is the more powerful long-term option.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
Michigan vs Boston University for recruiting: which school has better access to employers and internships?
Michigan vs Northwestern for recruiting: which is better for college recruiting opportunities?
Michigan vs UC San Diego for research opportunities: which is better for undergraduates?
Michigan vs. Illinois for business: Which is better for undergraduate business recruiting and internships?
For engineering jobs, is the University of Michigan or Stanford better for recruiting and internships?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!