NYU vs Penn for finance: which is better for investment banking recruiting and finance careers?
I’m a high school senior trying to decide between NYU and Penn and I want to study finance. Both seem strong, but I keep seeing people say Penn is better for banking while NYU has the advantage of being in New York City.
I’m mainly looking for which school tends to give undergrads a stronger path into investment banking and finance jobs after graduation.
I’m mainly looking for which school tends to give undergrads a stronger path into investment banking and finance jobs after graduation.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is brand strength and on-campus recruiting depth at Penn versus location and year-round proximity to firms at NYU. For undergraduate finance, Penn’s Wharton School has the stronger built-in pipeline to investment banking, buy-side roles, and top finance employers, while NYU benefits from being in Manhattan and having very easy access to internships during the school year. Both can lead to strong outcomes, but the path is usually more direct at Penn.
For investment banking recruiting specifically, Penn has the edge. Wharton is one of the clearest target schools on Wall Street, and Penn undergrads benefit from a very large alumni network in banking, strong student clubs tied to recruiting, and employers that know exactly what they are getting from Penn candidates. That matters because IB hiring is heavily structured, and schools with deep target-school status tend to make first-round interviews and networking more accessible.
NYU is still very strong, especially through Stern. Stern is well respected in finance and places many students into banking, asset management, and related roles. Its New York location is a real advantage for coffee chats, semester internships, and staying close to the industry. But in a direct Penn versus NYU comparison, Penn usually carries more prestige in undergraduate finance recruiting, especially at the most competitive firms and groups.
One important detail is that this comparison depends a lot on whether your Penn option is Wharton or Penn more broadly, and whether your NYU option is Stern. Wharton versus Stern is a win for Wharton in recruiting power. Stern versus Penn outside Wharton is closer, though Penn still has a very strong overall reputation and access to finance recruiting.
If your goal is the strongest undergraduate launch into investment banking and high-finance recruiting, Penn is the better choice, particularly if it is Wharton. NYU Stern remains an excellent option and may be more attractive if you value living in New York and building experience through in-semester internships, but Penn tends to offer the more powerful recruiting platform.
For investment banking recruiting specifically, Penn has the edge. Wharton is one of the clearest target schools on Wall Street, and Penn undergrads benefit from a very large alumni network in banking, strong student clubs tied to recruiting, and employers that know exactly what they are getting from Penn candidates. That matters because IB hiring is heavily structured, and schools with deep target-school status tend to make first-round interviews and networking more accessible.
NYU is still very strong, especially through Stern. Stern is well respected in finance and places many students into banking, asset management, and related roles. Its New York location is a real advantage for coffee chats, semester internships, and staying close to the industry. But in a direct Penn versus NYU comparison, Penn usually carries more prestige in undergraduate finance recruiting, especially at the most competitive firms and groups.
One important detail is that this comparison depends a lot on whether your Penn option is Wharton or Penn more broadly, and whether your NYU option is Stern. Wharton versus Stern is a win for Wharton in recruiting power. Stern versus Penn outside Wharton is closer, though Penn still has a very strong overall reputation and access to finance recruiting.
If your goal is the strongest undergraduate launch into investment banking and high-finance recruiting, Penn is the better choice, particularly if it is Wharton. NYU Stern remains an excellent option and may be more attractive if you value living in New York and building experience through in-semester internships, but Penn tends to offer the more powerful recruiting platform.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!
Start the conversation
Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.
Related Questions
Students also ask…
NYU vs Vanderbilt for finance careers: which is better for recruiting and internships?
Rutgers vs Fordham for finance: which is better for landing internships and jobs?
NYU vs UVA for politics: which is better for a student interested in political science and government careers?
NYU vs MIT for math: which is better for an undergraduate math major?
NYU vs BU for computer science: which is better for CS majors?
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!