Amherst or Tufts for international relations: which is better for undergraduate IR?

I’m trying to decide between Amherst and Tufts for studying international relations in college. I know both are strong schools, but I want to understand which one is generally better for an undergraduate who is really focused on IR.

I’m interested in the overall experience for someone who wants to study diplomacy, global politics, and related areas.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is depth versus breadth: Tufts gives you a more visibly built-out international relations ecosystem from day one, while Amherst gives you a smaller liberal arts setting with very close faculty access and more flexibility across disciplines. For undergraduate IR specifically, Tufts has the clearer institutional advantage because of its long-standing focus on international affairs, the presence of the Fletcher School on campus, and strong connections to Boston-area policy and global organizations. Amherst is excellent academically, but IR there is less of a signature campus-wide strength than it is at Tufts.

At Tufts, students interested in diplomacy and global politics benefit from a campus culture where international affairs is a major center of gravity. Even as an undergraduate, being around graduate-level policy activity, speakers, language study, and internationally focused student organizations can matter a lot. The Boston-area location also makes internships and term-time exposure to policy, nonprofits, and global issue work more accessible than they would be in Amherst’s more rural setting.

Amherst’s advantage is the classic liberal arts model done at a very high level. If you want seminar-style classes, intense discussion, and the freedom to mix political science with history, economics, anthropology, or languages in a very individualized way, Amherst does that exceptionally well. It can be a great place to prepare for IR, especially for students who want a broad intellectual foundation before graduate school or public service. The Five College Consortium also expands course options somewhat.

For an undergraduate who is really focused on IR itself, not just political science more broadly, Tufts is the more compelling choice. It offers a denser concentration of relevant coursework, extracurriculars, faculty interest, and career-facing opportunities tied directly to international affairs. Amherst is a fantastic school, but if the question is specifically which one is better for undergraduate IR, Tufts has the edge.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!