Is Michigan or Johns Hopkins better for undergraduate research opportunities?

I’m trying to decide between the University of Michigan and Johns Hopkins, and research is a big factor for me. I want to know which school is generally better for an undergrad who wants to get involved in research early and have strong opportunities in that area.

I’m not asking about a specific major, just the overall research environment and how easy it is for students to find meaningful research experience.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
For undergraduate research specifically, Johns Hopkins usually has the edge if you want a campus where research is central to the school’s identity and it feels normal to start looking for lab work early. Hopkins is deeply research-driven across the university, especially in the sciences, engineering, public health, and medicine-adjacent fields, and undergrads often benefit from being in a place where faculty and labs are highly active. The smaller undergraduate population can also make the environment feel more focused and easier to navigate once you start building relationships.

Michigan is also excellent for research, but it suits a somewhat different student. If you want a huge university with an enormous range of departments, institutes, labs, and interdisciplinary options, Michigan offers a massive amount of opportunity. Students who are proactive, comfortable with a big campus, and willing to email broadly, visit office hours, and search across many units can do extremely well there.

Hopkins tends to fit the student who wants research to be part of the everyday culture from the start. In practice, that can make it feel easier to find peers who are already in labs, faculty who expect undergrads to be interested, and structured pathways into research. If your main priority is meaningful research exposure as early as possible, Hopkins often feels more concentrated and intentional.

Michigan fits the student who likes having many possible directions and does not mind a little more self-navigation. Because it is so large, access can vary more by department and by how persistent you are, but the upside is exceptional breadth. You can find serious research there in nearly any field, and the scale of the university creates options that few schools can match.

Both do, at a very high level. But for an undergrad choosing based mainly on early, research-centered culture and ease of plugging into that environment, Johns Hopkins is the one I would lean toward.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!