How do Princeton and Colgate compare for studying economics as an undergraduate?

I’m trying to decide between these two schools and economics is probably my main academic interest. I know both have strong reputations, but I’m not sure how they differ in terms of the econ department experience for undergrads.

I’m mostly trying to understand the overall academic environment for an economics major, not just the school’s name or prestige.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is scale and intensity versus intimacy and access. Princeton offers a larger, more research-driven economics environment with many upper-level options, a very prominent faculty, and especially strong connections to quantitative economics, public policy, finance, and graduate-level scholarship. Colgate gives you a smaller liberal arts setting where economics majors often get closer faculty interaction, smaller classes overall, and a department experience that can feel more personal day to day.

At Princeton, economics is one of the university’s most visible undergraduate fields, so the department has real depth. You are more likely to find a wider menu of electives and a campus culture where many students are deeply engaged with economics, mathematics, computer science, policy, and related fields. The academic atmosphere can feel fast-paced and highly analytical, and students who enjoy theory, formal modeling, and being surrounded by a large concentration of very academically driven peers often thrive there.

Colgate’s advantage is that the undergraduate experience is the center of the institution. That matters because economics courses are not competing with a major graduate program for attention, and faculty teaching is a core priority. For some students, that leads to more discussion, easier access to professors, and a stronger sense of being known as an individual rather than one student among many interested in the same major.

In terms of preparation, both can lead to strong outcomes, but the style is different. Princeton may give you broader exposure to high-level economics and adjacent quantitative work, which is especially useful if you might later consider research, top policy work, or a very math-heavy path. Colgate can be excellent if you want rigorous economics within a classic liberal arts framework and value close mentorship as much as departmental breadth.

Princeton has the more powerful department academically, but Colgate can offer the more personal one. I would lean Princeton for economics unless you know you learn best in a smaller, relationship-driven classroom environment and want that to shape your whole college experience.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!