Is Yale or Amherst better for studying English as an undergraduate?

I’m trying to decide between Yale and Amherst and English is the main subject I want to study. Both seem strong on paper, but I’m not sure which one would be the better fit for an English major in terms of classes, advising, and the overall experience.

I’m mainly interested in literature and writing, and I want to choose the school that would give me the strongest English program.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
Yale has the edge for undergraduate English if you want the broadest set of literature and writing opportunities. Its English department is larger, the course catalog is deeper across periods and theory, and Yale also gives undergrads access to a major creative writing presence through the English department and related programs. For a student who wants maximum range in classes and a lot happening around books, criticism, and writing, Yale usually offers more infrastructure.

The biggest difference is scale and depth of offerings. Yale can support more specialized seminars in areas like medieval literature, modernism, Black studies, film and media, poetry, literary theory, and global Anglophone work, often in the same semester. Amherst’s English department is excellent, but as a smaller liberal arts college it will usually have fewer total courses and fewer niche options available at once.

Advising and classroom experience point in Amherst’s favor. Amherst is known for very close faculty access, small discussion-based classes, and an undergraduate-centered academic culture with no graduate students competing for faculty attention. If your ideal English experience is intense seminar conversation, close mentoring, and professors who are deeply focused on teaching undergrads, Amherst can feel more personal.

For writing, Yale benefits from a bigger literary ecosystem. Beyond English courses, there are student publications, visiting writers, public lectures, theater connections, and a wider university network that can matter if you want to explore journalism, screen studies, drama, or interdisciplinary humanities work. Amherst still offers strong writing instruction and a serious literary community, but Yale gives you more outlets and adjacent resources.

One more practical distinction is academic flexibility. Amherst’s open curriculum makes it especially easy to dive deeply into English without distribution requirements shaping your schedule, which many humanities students love. Yale offers plenty of freedom too, but Amherst can make the undergraduate path feel more self-directed from the start.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!