Brown vs Penn for economics: which is better for undergraduate economics?

I’m trying to decide between Brown and Penn and economics is the main major I’m considering. Both seem strong, but I’m having a hard time telling which one is the better fit for an undergrad who wants a solid economics education.

I’m especially trying to understand how people generally compare the two schools for economics in terms of academics and overall experience.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is structured pre-professional intensity at Penn versus academic flexibility at Brown. For undergraduate economics specifically, Penn usually has the stronger reputation because of the overall business and finance ecosystem around Wharton, the larger volume of economics-adjacent opportunities, and Penn’s location in Philadelphia, which tends to make internships and employer access easier during the school year. Brown, though, offers a very respected economics program in a more open-ended academic environment, with the Open Curriculum giving you far more freedom in how you build your education.

Academically, Penn economics tends to feel more connected to students interested in finance, consulting, policy, and quantitative work. Even if you are not in Wharton, being on the same campus matters because there are more peers headed into those fields, more clubs built around them, and more recruiting energy around economics-related careers. That can be a real advantage if you already suspect you may want a career path that is market-facing or business-oriented.

Brown economics is excellent, but the experience is different. The department is strong, and Brown students often benefit from smaller-scale campus culture, close faculty access, and a less rigid atmosphere. If you want to combine economics with something like public policy, math, history, computer science, or a creative field without feeling boxed in by requirements, Brown is especially appealing.

In overall experience, Penn is typically more fast-paced and career-focused, while Brown is more exploratory and student-directed. That difference tends to matter just as much as department quality. Two students can study economics at both places and come away with very different college experiences.

If the question is strictly which school has the edge for undergraduate economics, I would give Penn the nod. If what you want is a strong economics education inside a more flexible and less pre-professional college environment, Brown has a very real case and may end up being the better personal fit.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!