Carnegie Mellon vs UPenn for data science: which is better for an undergraduate degree?

I’m trying to decide between Carnegie Mellon and UPenn for studying data science as an undergrad. I’m interested in the overall strength of the program, especially how well it prepares students for internships, research, and jobs after graduation.

I know both schools are strong, but I’m having trouble figuring out which one is generally the better choice for someone who wants to focus on data science.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
The biggest practical tradeoff is depth versus breadth. Carnegie Mellon is usually the more technically intense option for undergraduate data science, with especially strong connections to computer science, machine learning, statistics, and hands-on research, while Penn gives you a broader university structure with excellent access to business, healthcare, economics, and interdisciplinary applications of data.

For pure data science training, CMU tends to stand out more. Its culture is heavily centered on computing and quantitative work, and that shows up in coursework, peer environment, recruiting, and research opportunities. If you want to be surrounded by students aiming at software, AI, machine learning, and technical data roles, CMU often has the sharper concentration.

Penn is still a very strong place to study data science, but one of its biggest advantages is how easily you can combine it with other fields. That matters if your interests lean toward finance, policy, biotech, consumer tech, or entrepreneurship. Penn’s ecosystem can make it easier to build a profile that mixes analytics with domain expertise, especially through cross-school opportunities.

For internships and jobs, both schools place well, but CMU has a particularly strong reputation with technical employers and can give undergrads a very direct pipeline into engineering-heavy and machine learning-adjacent roles. Penn also places extremely well, especially when students use its network strategically, but the path can feel a bit less singularly centered on technical data science than at CMU.

For undergraduate research, CMU again has an edge if you want deeply computational work. Penn offers excellent research too, especially in applied areas, but CMU is often the place students choose when they want the most intense technical environment from day one.

If your goal is the strongest undergraduate platform specifically for data science itself, I’d lean Carnegie Mellon. I’d put Penn ahead only if you know you want data science embedded in a broader academic and professional setting rather than as your most technical focus.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!