Brown vs Columbia for undergraduate research opportunities

I’m trying to compare Brown and Columbia mainly for research as an undergrad. I’m interested in how easy it is to get involved in projects, especially early on, and whether students usually find opportunities through professors, labs, or formal programs.

I know both schools are strong academically, but I’m trying to understand which one tends to be better for a student who wants lots of hands-on research experience.
0 views
College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Sundial AI
AI-assisted guidance informed by the expertise of Sundial's admissions advisors
Brown has a slight edge if your top priority is getting into hands-on research early and with less institutional friction. Its undergraduate focus, smaller graduate footprint in many departments, and culture of close faculty access often make it easier for students to join projects sooner. Columbia offers outstanding research too, but the scale and graduate-heavy environment can make the path feel more formal and competitive in some fields.

At Brown, one concrete advantage is how central undergraduates are to the academic culture. Faculty mentoring is a big part of the university’s identity, and students often connect with professors directly through classes, office hours, or independent study. Brown also has structured support for undergrad research through department programs and campus funding, but it tends to feel less bureaucratic than at larger research universities.

Another differentiator is the role of graduate students. Columbia’s research enterprise is enormous, which is great in terms of the number and prestige of labs, institutes, and medical center opportunities. But in practice, undergrads can sometimes be one layer further from the principal investigator, especially in lab sciences where doctoral students and postdocs drive much of the day-to-day work. That does not block access, but it can mean students need to be more proactive and patient to get meaningful responsibility early.

Brown’s Open Curriculum also helps on the research side. It can make it easier to explore across fields, build unusual combinations, and start independent or interdisciplinary work without as many core requirements shaping your schedule. Columbia absolutely has strong interdisciplinary options too, especially given New York City and its affiliated institutions, but Brown often feels more flexible for designing a research path around your own questions.

For formal pathways, both schools have summer funding, faculty-led labs, and programs that help students find placements. Columbia may be especially appealing if you want access to a massive urban research ecosystem, public policy institutes, journalism, global affairs, or biomedical connections tied to New York. Brown stands out more for the student who wants quicker faculty contact, easier ownership of projects, and a campus where undergraduate research feels especially woven into everyday academic life.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!

Comments & Questions (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to ask a question or share your thoughts!

Start the conversation

Have a follow-up question or want to share your experience? Leave a comment below.

College is too important to leave to AI
Life-changing decisions deserve guidance from an expert
A real advisor gets to know you, brings experience from helping other students, and helps you make choices with confidence.
Have questions about the admissions process?
Start working with a Sundial advisor today!